From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: exclusive access to can interface Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:16:20 +0100 Message-ID: <50EB10F4.6070308@pengutronix.de> References: <2412937.XVpYjfC7zz@ws-stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1E4F0D0F329C73A36E0C97DC" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:58342 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753217Ab3AGSQ1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2013 13:16:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2412937.XVpYjfC7zz@ws-stein> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Stein Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1E4F0D0F329C73A36E0C97DC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/07/2013 05:52 PM, Alexander Stein wrote: > is there a way to get exclusive (write) access to a CAN interface, so > that only one bound socket can write CAN frames on the bus? No, what's the use case? Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --------------enig1E4F0D0F329C73A36E0C97DC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDrEPgACgkQjTAFq1RaXHPKZACbBi9OUobYwkkAXNdqbyx3Ei8u pY8An0xGMzN6NoMzrmsUfah2wbYSJcCx =m/eW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1E4F0D0F329C73A36E0C97DC--