linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: exclusive access to can interface
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:08:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50EBF024.1030507@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2293513.Wi876mfY7y@ws-stein>

On 01/08/2013 10:23 AM, Alexander Stein wrote:
> Hello Marc,
> 
> On Monday 07 January 2013 19:16:20, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>> On 01/07/2013 05:52 PM, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>> is there a way to get exclusive (write) access to a CAN interface, so
>>> that only one bound socket can write CAN frames on the bus?
>>
>> No, what's the use case?
> 
> This was a customers request in order to prevent multiple applications (or 
> instances) to send CAN frames on a specific CAN interface at the same time 
> with the very same CAN-IDs. Concurrent reads shall still be allowed!

Application == CANopen?! It's like giving exclusive access to a network
device. Isn't that possible? Well, at a first glance I have not found
anything like that.

Wolfgang.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-08 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-07 16:52 exclusive access to can interface Alexander Stein
2013-01-07 18:16 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-01-08  9:23   ` Alexander Stein
2013-01-08  9:32     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-01-08  9:48       ` Alexander Stein
2013-01-08 10:09         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-01-08 10:18           ` Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
2013-01-08 10:08     ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2013-01-08 10:15       ` Heinz-Jürgen Oertel
2013-01-22  9:41   ` Alexander Stein
2013-01-22 12:53     ` Kurt Van Dijck
2013-01-22 13:36       ` Alexander Stein
2013-01-07 18:37 ` Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50EBF024.1030507@grandegger.com \
    --to=wg@grandegger.com \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).