From: Amit Virdi <amit.virdi@st.com>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@st.com>,
"anilkumar@ti.com" <anilkumar@ti.com>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@list.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: c_can: Provide generic interface to configure c-can message objects
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:41:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F66ECB.8070203@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F66CE3.8070302@grandegger.com>
On 1/16/2013 2:33 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> On 01/16/2013 08:45 AM, Amit Virdi wrote:
>> On 12/21/2012 1:43 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> On 12/20/2012 03:04 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>>>> On 12/20/2012 11:05 AM, Amit Virdi wrote:
>>>>> Depending on the underlying platform, the configuration of the c-can
>>>>> message objects can change. For e.g. in some systems, it makes more
>>>>> sense to receive many message objects and transmit very few. In any
>>>>> case, providing flexibility in configuring the message objects is
>>>>> highly
>>>>> desirable.
>>>>>
>>>>> The total number of message objects for C_CAN controller is fixed at
>>>>> 32.
>>>>> The receive message objects are assigned higher priority so they begin
>>>>> with message object#1. So, in order to configure the message object the
>>>>> driver just needs two parameters - rx_split (for differentiating
>>>>> between
>>>>> lower bucket and higher bucket) and tx_num.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, if the user doesn't specify these parameters, then the message
>>>>> objects are configured with default parameters with equal distribution
>>>>> of receive and transmit message objects (16 each).
>>>>
>>>> As Wolfgang pointed out, the DT should only describe the hardware. In
>>>> the ethernet world I think there is ethtool to configure the hardware.
>>>> Maybe we need something similar for CAN (or add CAN support to ethtool).
>>>
>>> Yeah, a simple tool using simple ioctl request would be nice, indeed.
>>> Well, as a per device setting seems overkill a simple module parameter
>>> would just do it.
>>>
>>
>> So, you're saying to drop the device configuration from the DT and use
>> some tool to do that. This would be nice if there are enough devices,
>> apart from the Bosch C-CAN controller, which require this sort of
>> configuration.
>
> No, I said: "a simple module parameter would just do it".
>
Ok, now I understood!
Regards
Amit Virdi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-20 10:05 [PATCH 0/3] c_can: Update can support Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] can: c_can: Correct register alignment info passing through DT Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 13:59 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-01-16 7:40 ` Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] can: c_can: Provide generic interface to configure c-can message objects Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 10:26 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-20 10:53 ` Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 11:06 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2012-12-20 11:12 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-20 11:18 ` Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 12:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2012-12-20 14:04 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2012-12-20 20:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-16 7:45 ` Amit Virdi
2013-01-16 8:25 ` Bhupesh SHARMA
2013-01-16 9:01 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-16 9:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-01-16 9:11 ` Amit Virdi [this message]
2012-12-20 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] can: c_can: Enable clock before first use Amit Virdi
2012-12-20 14:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-01-16 8:03 ` Amit Virdi
2013-01-16 9:54 ` AnilKumar, Chimata
2013-01-16 13:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-20 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/3] c_can: Update can support Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F66ECB.8070203@st.com \
--to=amit.virdi@st.com \
--cc=anilkumar@ti.com \
--cc=bhupesh.sharma@st.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).