From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: fix sja1000 pre_irq/post_irq handling
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 21:51:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52892C36.8060709@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5288CFEF.3060701@hartkopp.net>
Hi Oliver,
On 11/17/2013 03:17 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> The SJA1000 driver provides optional function pointers to handle specific
> hardware setups at interrupt time.
>
> This patch fixes the issue that the sja1000_interrupt() function may have
> returned IRQ_NONE without processing the post_irq function. Additionally
> an introduced return value from the pre_irq function is checked to skip the
> entire interrupt handling on pre_irq function errors.
>
> Reported-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
> index 7164a99..bb20470 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
> @@ -494,12 +494,12 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> uint8_t isrc, status;
> int n = 0;
>
> + if (priv->pre_irq && priv->pre_irq(priv))
> + goto out;
> +
Well, not sure if we need that. Looks like a fatal error to me.
> /* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
> if (priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> -
> - if (priv->pre_irq)
> - priv->pre_irq(priv);
> + goto out;
>
> while ((isrc = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IR)) &&
> (n < SJA1000_MAX_IRQ)) {
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
> /* check for absent controller due to hw unplug */
> if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> + goto out;
Be aware that the function will return IRQ_HANDLED if n > 0... which may
happen. Not exactly the same behaviour.
>
> if (isrc & IRQ_WUI)
> netdev_warn(dev, "wakeup interrupt\n");
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
> /* check for absent controller */
> if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
> - return IRQ_NONE;
> + goto out;
Ditto.
> }
> }
> if (isrc & (IRQ_DOI | IRQ_EI | IRQ_BEI | IRQ_EPI | IRQ_ALI)) {
> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> break;
> }
> }
> -
> +out:
> if (priv->post_irq)
> priv->post_irq(priv);
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-17 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-17 14:17 [PATCH] can: fix sja1000 pre_irq/post_irq handling Oliver Hartkopp
2013-11-17 20:51 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2013-11-18 6:17 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-11-18 7:48 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-18 13:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-11-18 13:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-18 19:48 ` Kurt Van Dijck
2013-11-18 20:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-11-19 0:05 ` Pavel Pisa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52892C36.8060709@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).