From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: SocketCAN over Ethernet Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 21:42:30 +0200 Message-ID: <533DB9A6.6030605@hartkopp.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.163]:52968 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753434AbaDCTmd (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:42:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Bostr=F6m?= , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Hello Daniel, On 03.04.2014 13:52, Daniel Bostr=F6m wrote: > Currently we are running Ubuntu in a virtual machine using=20 > VirtualBox on a Windows host. In Ubuntu we use SocketCAN and we would= like=20 > to continue to do so but instead of using real CAN hardware somehow s= etup=20 > CAN communication over Ethernet to the Windows host. Don't know if I understand you correctly: Do you want the CAN interfaces to be attached to the Windows host and a= ccess these interfaces from Linux ... or the other way around? Maybe a look at the JAVA tool Kayak (http://kayak.2codeornot2code.org/)= might be interesting for you. Kayak uses the socketcand (https://github.com/dschanoeh/socketcand/) wh= ich runs on Linux and provides the CAN interfaces via IP-sockets (to whatev= er client). Regards, Oliver