From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: khurram gulzar <khurramgulzar@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module.
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:55:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534D1E4F.4030405@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s8ZroY7j8MLpFQh568QdeB24zBwVAVXbi7RzQF+baFi+Mpkw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Khurram,
the speed is only set with the 'ip' tool now.
And regarding the former iomux handling it should be like this:
modprobe sja1000_isa port=0x200,0x204 irq=10,11 indirect=1,1
See the code for further module parameter details:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
Regards,
Oliver
On 15.04.2014 13:25, khurram gulzar wrote:
> Thanx Oliver,
> Yes indeed its a v.big time loop.
> I was previously using sja1000-iomux
> sja1000_isa i can only load one module can0 at address 0x200 but cant load
> 0x204 bus
> modprobe sja1000_isa port=0x200,0x204 irq=10,11 with speed parameter set by ip
> link set command
> there is an indirect parameter, I have no idea how it is used could you elaborate
> my base address is 0x200 and 0x204 with irq 10 and 11 speed 1000,1000
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net
> <mailto:socketcan@hartkopp.net>> wrote:
>
> Hello Khurram,
>
> we're obviously in a time loop :-)
>
> See your same request ~5 years ago:
>
> http://socket-can.996257.n3.nabble.com/Support-needed-for-Eurotech-COM1273-Dual-Channel-CAN-PC104-Module-td1524.html
>
> I assume the sja1000_isa driver will be the right one for this old card.
> It is part of mainline Linux - so no need to compile old SocketCAN sources
> from the SVN.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> On 15.04.2014 11:55, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > Hi Khurram,
> >
> > we have switched to a new mailing list some time ago, which I have
> > therefore added to the CC.
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:07:15 +0300, khurram gulzar
> > <khurramgulzar@gmail.com <mailto:khurramgulzar@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> Hi Oliver and Wolfgang,
> >> Thanks for your support in advance
> >> I have recently updated the system from Kernel 2.6 to use the new kernel
> >> 3.2 for linux. I have noticed that the socket-can is integrated in the
> >> kernel. I enabled the driver in the kernel from the kernel config.
> >> The drivers are loaded successfully and both the CAN are transmitting
> > the
> >> packets. However its unable to receive any packets on any of the CAN.
> >> The system configurations are still the same loaded drivers
> >> -> can.ko-> can-raw.ko-> sja1000-iomux
> >
> > There is now module named "sja1000-iomux" in the mainline kernel.
> > Where did you get it from?
> >
> >> The address of can is configured to base=0x200,0x204 and irq=10,11 with
> >> speed=1000,1000 i.e. 1Mbits/sec
> >> I have checked the irq in /proc/interrupts. IRQ 10 and 11 are showing
> >> connected to CAN0 and CAN1.
> >
> > Do the IRQ counts increase when you send messages?
> >
> >> Can you please tell me what seems to be wrong- Waiting for your
> >> reply
> >
> > Could you switch to a recent mainline kernel version?
> >
> > Wolfgang.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-can" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+s8ZrqFBun4bo2rJJFHb0FrV7m7PLybUVM+jjahKsdW8bdnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 9:55 ` Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module Wolfgang Grandegger
2014-04-15 10:50 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroY7j8MLpFQh568QdeB24zBwVAVXbi7RzQF+baFi+Mpkw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 11:55 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
[not found] ` <CA+s8Zrqrd_U0g1GRCDzXncgWLA_kO3Hyhjwy6Oe1S0cYohm2og@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 12:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 12:33 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 13:19 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 13:42 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 17:30 ` [PATCH] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 21:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-16 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-17 19:23 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-21 17:39 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroSGpijgG4ruk2T1V5Vp1WrCcVjVPPrqGU-rQSDEUxzXg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 11:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-26 19:18 ` [PATCH] slip: fix spinlock variant Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-28 3:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534D1E4F.4030405@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=khurramgulzar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).