From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: khurram gulzar <khurramgulzar@gmail.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module.
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:00:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534D1F63.6080101@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+s8Zrqrd_U0g1GRCDzXncgWLA_kO3Hyhjwy6Oe1S0cYohm2og@mail.gmail.com>
As I wrote in the other thread:
> The command i am executing is
> modprobe sja1000_isa port=0x200,0x204 irq=10,11 indirect=1
The parameters for each interface are given separately
> but in dmesg it says
>>> probe of sja1000_isa.1 failed with error -16
That's correct as you did not provide the 'indirect' flags to the _second_
interface :-)
So
modprobe sja1000_isa port=0x200,0x204 irq=10,11 indirect=1,1
should make it.
> I am now running linux kernel version 3.2
A good choice :-)
Best regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+s8ZrqFBun4bo2rJJFHb0FrV7m7PLybUVM+jjahKsdW8bdnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 9:55 ` Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module Wolfgang Grandegger
2014-04-15 10:50 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroY7j8MLpFQh568QdeB24zBwVAVXbi7RzQF+baFi+Mpkw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 11:55 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8Zrqrd_U0g1GRCDzXncgWLA_kO3Hyhjwy6Oe1S0cYohm2og@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 12:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2014-04-15 12:33 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 13:19 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 13:42 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 17:30 ` [PATCH] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 21:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-16 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-17 19:23 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-21 17:39 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroSGpijgG4ruk2T1V5Vp1WrCcVjVPPrqGU-rQSDEUxzXg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 11:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-26 19:18 ` [PATCH] slip: fix spinlock variant Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-28 3:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534D1F63.6080101@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=khurramgulzar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).