From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: khurram gulzar <khurramgulzar@gmail.com>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module.
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:19:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534D31EF.6050107@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534D270D.5060705@pengutronix.de>
Something like this?
It uses the dev->dev_id which was missed in the 3e66d0138c05d9792f patch before.
Just compile-tested by now ...
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
index df136a2..46e1784 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int clk[MAXDEV];
static unsigned char cdr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
static unsigned char ocr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
static int indirect[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = -1};
+static spinlock_t indirect_lock[MAXDEV]; /* lock for indirect access mode */
module_param_array(port, ulong, NULL, S_IRUGO);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(port, "I/O port number");
@@ -101,19 +102,28 @@ static void sja1000_isa_port_write_reg(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
static u8 sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
int reg)
{
- unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ unsigned long base, flags;
+ u8 readval;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
+ base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
outb(reg, base);
- return inb(base + 1);
+ readval = inb(base + 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
+
+ return readval;
}
static void sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
int reg, u8 val)
{
- unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ unsigned long base, flags;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
+ base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
outb(reg, base);
outb(val, base + 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
}
static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -169,6 +179,7 @@ static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (iosize == SJA1000_IOSIZE_INDIRECT) {
priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect;
priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect;
+ spin_lock_init(&indirect_lock[idx]);
} else {
priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg;
priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg;
@@ -198,6 +209,7 @@ static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
+ dev->dev_id = idx;
err = register_sja1000dev(dev);
if (err) {
On 15.04.2014 14:33, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 02:00 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> As I wrote in the other thread:
>>
>>> The command i am executing is
>>> modprobe sja1000_isa port=0x200,0x204 irq=10,11 indirect=1
>>
>> The parameters for each interface are given separately
>
> The indirect mode is racy, btw....
>
>> static u8 sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
>> int reg)
>> {
>> unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
>>
>> outb(reg, base);
>> return inb(base + 1);
>> }
>>
>> static void sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
>> int reg, u8 val)
>> {
>> unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
>>
>> outb(reg, base);
>> outb(val, base + 1);
>> }
>
> We need locks.
>
> Marc
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-15 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+s8ZrqFBun4bo2rJJFHb0FrV7m7PLybUVM+jjahKsdW8bdnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 9:55 ` Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module Wolfgang Grandegger
2014-04-15 10:50 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroY7j8MLpFQh568QdeB24zBwVAVXbi7RzQF+baFi+Mpkw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 11:55 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8Zrqrd_U0g1GRCDzXncgWLA_kO3Hyhjwy6Oe1S0cYohm2og@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 12:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 12:33 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 13:19 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2014-04-15 13:42 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 17:30 ` [PATCH] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 21:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-16 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-17 19:23 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-21 17:39 ` Oliver Hartkopp
[not found] ` <CA+s8ZroSGpijgG4ruk2T1V5Vp1WrCcVjVPPrqGU-rQSDEUxzXg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 11:41 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-26 19:18 ` [PATCH] slip: fix spinlock variant Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-28 3:35 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534D31EF.6050107@hartkopp.net \
--to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=khurramgulzar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).