linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
	khurram gulzar <khurramgulzar@gmail.com>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:49:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534DA95D.60506@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404152323500.22697@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2391 bytes --]

On 04/15/2014 11:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
>> When accessing the SJA1000 controller registers in the indirect access mode,
>> writing the register number and reading/writing the data has to be an atomic
>> attempt.
>>
>> As the sja1000_isa driver is an old style driver with a fixed number of
>> instances the locking variable depends on the same index like all the other
>> configuration elements given on the module command line.
>>
>> As a positive side effect dev->dev_id is populated by the instance index,
>> which was missing in 3e66d0138c05d9 ("can: populate netdev::dev_id for udev
>> discrimination").
>>
>> Reported-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
>> index df136a2..014695d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int clk[MAXDEV];
>>  static unsigned char cdr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
>>  static unsigned char ocr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
>>  static int indirect[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = -1};
>> +static spinlock_t indirect_lock[MAXDEV];  /* lock for indirect access mode */
> 
> You need to initialize the spinlock if you want to survive lockdep.
> 
> Either use the proper static initializer or do an explicit
> spin_lock_init() on each of the locks before using them.

There's a spin_lock_init in the probe function:

>  static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -169,6 +177,7 @@ static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		if (iosize == SJA1000_IOSIZE_INDIRECT) {
>  			priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect;
>  			priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect;
> +			spin_lock_init(&indirect_lock[idx]);
>  		} else {
>  			priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg;
>  			priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg;

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 242 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-15 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CA+s8ZrqFBun4bo2rJJFHb0FrV7m7PLybUVM+jjahKsdW8bdnaQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15  9:55 ` Problem with Eurotech COM1273 Dual Channel CAN PC104 Module Wolfgang Grandegger
2014-04-15 10:50   ` Oliver Hartkopp
     [not found]     ` <CA+s8ZroY7j8MLpFQh568QdeB24zBwVAVXbi7RzQF+baFi+Mpkw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 11:55       ` Oliver Hartkopp
     [not found]     ` <CA+s8Zrqrd_U0g1GRCDzXncgWLA_kO3Hyhjwy6Oe1S0cYohm2og@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-15 12:00       ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 12:33         ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 13:19           ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 13:42             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-15 17:30               ` [PATCH] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-15 21:26                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-15 21:49                   ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2014-04-16  8:48                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-04-17 19:23                 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-04-21 17:39                 ` Oliver Hartkopp
     [not found]                   ` <CA+s8ZroSGpijgG4ruk2T1V5Vp1WrCcVjVPPrqGU-rQSDEUxzXg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-24 11:41                     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-26 19:18               ` [PATCH] slip: fix spinlock variant Oliver Hartkopp
2014-04-28  3:35                 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534DA95D.60506@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=khurramgulzar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).