Re: (Case 14359) Kvaser socketCAN support

["Kvaser Support" <support@kvaser.com>]

The provided link covers chips and mentions ESD CAN Cards.  But I do not see any mention of Kvaser in the list.  So, on quick glance I thought it was a list of supported chips.

Most people who purchase will be looking for product level names.  They rarely look in depth at the chip or clock used in the product.  They just want the card to work and are trying to confirm that a particular product works with socketcan.

Best regards,

Troy
-- 
Kvaser Support
support@kvaser.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------



-----Original Message-----
From: "Yegor Yefremov" <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: "Yegor Yefremov" <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 09:48:45 +0200
To: "Kvaser Support" <support@kvaser.com>
Cc: "Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>, "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, "Olivier Sobrie" <olivier@sobrie.be>
Subject: Re: (Case 14359) Kvaser socketCAN support

>Hi Troy,
>
>What about this link
>(http://elinux.org/CAN_Bus#SocketCAN_Supported_Controllers)?
>
>Linux distribution table i.e. Linux kernel version where not bad. I've
>also thought about a list of Linux distors, that maintain can-utils,
>libsocketcan etc.
>
>Yegor
>
>On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Kvaser Support <support@kvaser.com> wrote:
>> Looking at the provided web page and associated links, I do not see:
>> - a list of vendor supported/tested CAN hardware
>> - the Linux distribution where this support was included.
>>
>> These are two basic questions that we get concerning socketcan.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Troy
>> --
>> Kvaser Support
>> support@kvaser.com
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>