From: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
To: Varka Bhadram <varkabhadram@gmail.com>,
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] CAN: CAN driver to support multiple CAN bus on SPI interface
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 09:57:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D20DDF.6000301@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D122C7.4020504@gmail.com>
Hi Varka,
On 24/07/2014 17:14, Varka Bhadram wrote:
>> In last case CONFIG_OF is not set
>> and a platform device sets the data.
>
> In our case we can load the driver by DT or Non-DT way.
>
> If the DT approach is not used means CONFIG_OF is not set. In this case
> the device ids wont be added in the kernel device ids. For this we have
> to define spi_device_ids and update .id_table in struct spi_driver.
>
I think we are doing the same thing with only a slight difference in the
implementation. For mcp251x the driver data is fix with the chip type
and there is not values set by the board. This let define the
driver_data inside the driver.
In my case I let that the platform data can be set, when CONFIG_OF=n, by
the board as it was common in the past, because I have some values that
depend on the board (number of channels, checksum enabled,..).
> For DT approach(CONFIG_OF = y) we have to define of_device_ids
> and update .driver.of_match_table with this ids.
Agree - exacttly the same is done in this driver.
Best regards,
Stefano Babic
--
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sbabic@denx.de
=====================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-25 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 10:11 [PATCH v4 0/3] Adding support for CAN busses via SPI interface Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] Add documentation for SPI to CAN driver Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] CAN: moved SPI drivers into a separate directory Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 18:13 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2014-07-24 18:31 ` Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 10:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] CAN: CAN driver to support multiple CAN bus on SPI interface Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 11:25 ` Varka Bhadram
2014-07-24 11:33 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-07-24 14:54 ` Stefano Babic
2014-07-24 15:14 ` Varka Bhadram
2014-07-25 7:57 ` Stefano Babic [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53D20DDF.6000301@denx.de \
--to=sbabic@denx.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
--cc=varkabhadram@gmail.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).