From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:15:46 +0200 Message-ID: <542BAA22.7010508@pengutronix.de> References: <1411995175-13540-1-git-send-email-david@protonic.nl> <2928841.hvxjaQ0ECy@ws-stein> <20141001082932.7f3d69d4@archvile> <1952804.jDdF5Ah5L9@ws-stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8FArJuNW7pkkttXDcm4DQow14s8jd8cQA" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:44169 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751497AbaJAHSq (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:18:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1952804.jDdF5Ah5L9@ws-stein> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alexander Stein , David Jander Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger , linux-can@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8FArJuNW7pkkttXDcm4DQow14s8jd8cQA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/01/2014 09:11 AM, Alexander Stein wrote: > BTW: You posted a patch for at91_can in June (Din't get opportunity > to try it yet), where you use a kfifo to accomplish the same, why not > here? The cyclic buffer approach is okay, from my point of view. Marc --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | --8FArJuNW7pkkttXDcm4DQow14s8jd8cQA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlQrqiUACgkQjTAFq1RaXHNWKgCfQxy15n3zzrvunJCtD+x2jv2o cukAnjt0p8xLgenBtqKljuP8GqgJ7Smx =o3jA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8FArJuNW7pkkttXDcm4DQow14s8jd8cQA--