linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>, linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 11:58:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <542BD038.2070106@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141001113432.18ec8bed@archvile>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1196 bytes --]

On 10/01/2014 11:34 AM, David Jander wrote:
[...]

> Back to topic: Can one of the maintainers (Wolfgang, Marc) give an opinion on
> how to best solve the following two issues:
> 
> 1.- Using MB area instead of FIFO for flexcan breaks RTR reception on older
> SoC's. My proposal is to modify my approach as to have two different IRQ
> handling paths: One that off-loads the RX-FIFO into the cyclic-buffer for
> older chips and one that uses the whole MB area and off-loads it into the same
> cyclic buffer for i.MX6, Vybrid and newer chips.

Sounds good.

> 2.- Since the problem addressed by my patch to at91_can is very similar, what
> about solving these problems in the SocketCAN framework (if that is possible)?

Have you had a look at my rx-fifo branch in
https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next? It already tries to
abstract the simulation of the FIFO with the linear mailboxes.

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-01  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-29 12:52 [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO David Jander
2014-09-29 13:29 ` Alexander Stein
2014-09-29 14:39   ` David Jander
2014-09-29 15:02     ` Alexander Stein
2014-09-30  7:13       ` David Jander
2014-09-30  7:43         ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01  6:29           ` David Jander
2014-10-01  7:11             ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01  7:15               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-01  8:29                 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01  9:07                   ` David Jander
2014-10-01  9:19                     ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01  9:34                       ` David Jander
2014-10-01  9:58                         ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2014-10-06  7:28                           ` David Jander
2014-10-06 10:00                             ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-06 11:17                               ` David Jander
2014-10-07  9:30                                 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] can: rx-fifo: Increase MB size limit from 32 to 64 David Jander
2014-10-07  9:30                                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] can: rx-fifo: Add support for IRQ readout and NAPI poll David Jander
2014-10-07 13:17                                   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] can: rx-fifo: Increase MB size limit from 32 to 64 Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-07 13:27                                     ` David Jander
2014-10-07 14:18                                       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08  9:08                               ` [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO David Jander
2014-10-08  9:56                                 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08 10:36                                   ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-08 10:43                                     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08 14:01                                   ` David Jander
2014-10-09 10:37                                     ` David Jander
2014-10-01  9:19               ` David Jander

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=542BD038.2070106@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
    --cc=david@protonic.nl \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wg@grandegger.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).