From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: David Jander <david@protonic.nl>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 12:00:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54326823.7030000@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141006092825.765bd50d@archvile>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1830 bytes --]
On 10/06/2014 09:28 AM, David Jander wrote:
>>> 2.- Since the problem addressed by my patch to at91_can is very similar,
>>> what about solving these problems in the SocketCAN framework (if that is
>>> possible)?
>>
>> Have you had a look at my rx-fifo branch in
>> https://gitorious.org/linux-can/linux-can-next? It already tries to
>> abstract the simulation of the FIFO with the linear mailboxes.
>
> Looks interesting. I think it is a good idea to do this in dev.c, since there
> are obviously more CAN drivers that can use this. Unfortunately it seems you
> are still pretending the napi-poll handler to call can_rx_fifo_poll().
> Wouldn't it be better to just empty all MBs into a circular buffer or kfifo
> from the interrupt handler instead?
Yes probably, I started the rx-fifo patch before you came up with that idea.
> I still don't understand the results Alexander is getting, though....
>
> What are you going to do with the rx-fifo work? Do you recommend to base my
> patch on that? In that case, calling can_rx_fifo_poll() from the interrupt
> handler will look a little awkward... but it should work. Or should I propose
> an extension to rx-fifo?
My plans, or rather the points that need to be addressed for the rx-fifo
are:
- improve to work with more than 32 mailboxes. 64 are probably enough
for everybody :)
- make it work with the flexcan linear buffers
- make it work with the ti_hecc driver
- add option or convert to run from interrupt handler and copy to
kfifo/cyclic buffer/...
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-06 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-29 12:52 [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO David Jander
2014-09-29 13:29 ` Alexander Stein
2014-09-29 14:39 ` David Jander
2014-09-29 15:02 ` Alexander Stein
2014-09-30 7:13 ` David Jander
2014-09-30 7:43 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01 6:29 ` David Jander
2014-10-01 7:11 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01 7:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-01 8:29 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01 9:07 ` David Jander
2014-10-01 9:19 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-01 9:34 ` David Jander
2014-10-01 9:58 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-06 7:28 ` David Jander
2014-10-06 10:00 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2014-10-06 11:17 ` David Jander
2014-10-07 9:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] can: rx-fifo: Increase MB size limit from 32 to 64 David Jander
2014-10-07 9:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] can: rx-fifo: Add support for IRQ readout and NAPI poll David Jander
2014-10-07 13:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] can: rx-fifo: Increase MB size limit from 32 to 64 Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-07 13:27 ` David Jander
2014-10-07 14:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08 9:08 ` [PATCH v5] can: flexcan: Re-write receive path to use MB queue instead of FIFO David Jander
2014-10-08 9:56 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08 10:36 ` Alexander Stein
2014-10-08 10:43 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2014-10-08 14:01 ` David Jander
2014-10-09 10:37 ` David Jander
2014-10-01 9:19 ` David Jander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54326823.7030000@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).