From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Hartkopp Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] can: m_can: fix possible sleep in napi poll Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 22:12:10 +0100 Message-ID: <5457EFAA.5010804@hartkopp.net> References: <1414579527-31100-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <5457B517.8030805@pengutronix.de> <5457CB6B.3080002@hartkopp.net> <5457EA62.5040906@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.161]:21878 "EHLO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753830AbaKCVMS (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:12:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5457EA62.5040906@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Marc Kleine-Budde , Dong Aisheng , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Cc: wg@grandegger.com, varkabhadram@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 11/03/2014 09:49 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 11/03/2014 07:37 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >> If possible I would suggest to push all 7 patches via can/master as it is >> pretty bad to say "M_CAN was introduced in 3.18 but M_CAN with CAN FD is >> working since 3.19". > > Sorry, probably not, as CAN FD is a new feature. However we may talk to > David, as the m_can driver was introduced in 3.18 anyways, so it's > unlikely to break anything with this patch. > Yes. It's just to be 'feature complete' for the FD enabled M_CAN driver. Hopefully it's ok for Dave ... Thanks, Oliver