On 04/01/2015 11:44 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>> On 04/01/2015 07:50 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>   >> +struct uniqframe {
>>> +	const struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> +	ktime_t tstamp;
>>> +};
>>
>> Nitpick: as ktime_t is always a 64 bit value, I think putting it first
>> might provide better alignment.
> 
> No objections. Good idea.

Thanks.

>> No need to repost, I'll change this while applying, if you're okay with
>> this.
> 
> I would suggest to take both patches into can-next (for 4.1).

I'll create a pull-request asap.

Marc.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |