linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: "Gerhard Uttenthaler" <uttenthaler@ems-wuensche.com>,
	"François Beaulier" <fbeaulier@orange.fr>,
	"Yegor Yefremov" <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux board with 10 CANs
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:48:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5555EB16.4090903@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5555E8DC.7050209@ems-wuensche.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]

On 05/15/2015 02:38 PM, Gerhard Uttenthaler wrote:

>> Module based solutions are too expensive, whether it is PCIe or
>> USB. There are some bridge chips PCIe <-> memory, but i'm not
>> familiar with that. And you are right the SJA1000 is an old 5V
>> beast !

> Also a point to consider is that the speed you can read a SJA1000 chip
> is based on the clock frequency of this chip. And you have to
> read/write byte by byte. This may be too slow for 10 channels.

A local memory bus may be faster for single byte/word accesses than a
PCIe bus. I'm not a hardware guy, though :)

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15  7:56 Linux board with 10 CANs François Beaulier
2015-05-15  8:20 ` Yegor Yefremov
2015-05-15  8:50   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15  9:11   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15  9:33     ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 10:24       ` Andri Yngvason
2015-05-15 12:40         ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 12:47           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15 13:04             ` AW: [BULK]Re: " Uwe Wilhelm (PEAK-System)
2015-05-15 13:17               ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-05-15 13:20                 ` AW: " Uwe Wilhelm (PEAK-System)
2015-05-15 14:18               ` François Beaulier
2015-05-15 12:38       ` Gerhard Uttenthaler
2015-05-15 12:48         ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2015-05-15 13:54 ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-18  9:07   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18 13:31     ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-20 11:35       ` Gediminas Simanskis
2015-05-21  3:19         ` Bernd Krumboeck
2015-05-15 15:24 ` Tom Evans
2015-05-18  9:25   ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18  9:40     ` Gerhard Bertelsmann
2015-05-18 11:13       ` François Beaulier
2015-05-18 12:56       ` Tom Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5555EB16.4090903@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=fbeaulier@orange.fr \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uttenthaler@ems-wuensche.com \
    --cc=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).