From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Armin Burchardt <armin@uni-bremen.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] slcand: add option -p<file> to write pid to a file.
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:55:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55759ECE.6000302@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608134327.Horde.pLkodAvAfc3OuL7mi_j9ulf@webmail.uni-bremen.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1428 bytes --]
On 06/08/2015 03:43 PM, Armin Burchardt wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>> I think "/run/slcand/<IFACE>" would fit better into modern file system
>> layout. What about having a default for the pid file path?
>
> I would not expect a daemon to accept a filename (or only parts of it) without
Me neither. I was thinking that "-p" without a path would generate a
pidfile in "/run/slcand/<IFACE>"
> a full path. The /etc/init.d/skeleton of Debian wheezy uses /var/run/$NAME.pid
wheezy (a.k.a. old-old-stable)? Ist that still alive? :D
> (for start-stop-daemon's --pidfile option).
> Do we know enough about the filesystem layout of existing (embedded)
> systems to define
> a useful default?
systemd uses "/run/<daemon>.pid" or "/run/<daemon>/<foo>.pid"
>> Does it make sense to open in exclusive mode?
>
> If another daemon is started with the same pidfile we would have to give
> up if the file already exists to take advantage of that. Is it
> expected of a daemon
> using a pidfile to exit with an error or should it just overwrite an
> existing file?
Right....probably not worth the trouble, keep it as is.
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 11:55 [PATCH 1/3] slcand: daemonize _after_ interface is created, renamed and up Armin Burchardt
2015-06-08 11:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] slcand: add option -p<file> to write pid to a file Armin Burchardt
2015-06-08 13:00 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-06-08 13:43 ` Armin Burchardt
2015-06-08 13:55 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2015-06-08 11:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] slcand: add option -u to set interface up/down state Armin Burchardt
2015-06-08 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] slcand: daemonize _after_ interface is created, renamed and up Marc Kleine-Budde
2015-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] slcand: improved patches Armin Burchardt
2015-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] slcand: daemonize _after_ interface is created and renamed Armin Burchardt
2015-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] slcand: add option -p<file> to write pid to a file Armin Burchardt
2015-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] slcand: add option -u to set interface up/down state Armin Burchardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55759ECE.6000302@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=armin@uni-bremen.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).