linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
To: Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@peak-system.com>
Cc: linux-can Mailing List <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can/peak_pci: fix FPGA potential frame loss issue
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:33:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <569F9AC5.6020706@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <569F99BE.70001@peak-system.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2172 bytes --]

On 01/20/2016 03:29 PM, Stephane Grosjean wrote:
> 
> Le 20/01/2016 15:11, Marc Kleine-Budde a écrit :
>> On 01/20/2016 12:15 PM, Stephane Grosjean wrote:
>>> This patch installs a workaround when the driver detects one of the
>>> following PEAK-System CAN interfaces, running a firmware < v1.3.0:
>> Is the problem fixed on FW >= 1.3.0? Is it possible to update the
>> firmware? If so, what about printing a warning message about known
>> problem with the firmware?
> 
> Yes, problem is fixed with 1.3.0.
> And yes, firmware can be updated.
> What kind of warning message are you talking about? Do you mean that 
> peak_pci could dev_warn() a text msg to inform about the fact that the 
> current FW is able to be upgraded?
> 
> If yes, since peak_pci prints a single info line per CAN channel, what 
> would you prefer?
> 
> - the same warning about the old FW version, for each candev, something 
> like:
> 
> [ 2200.129168] peak_pci 0000:05:01.0: can0 at 
> reg_base=0xffffc90000678000 cfg_base=0xffffc90000676000 irq=22 FW=1.2.0 
> should be updated
> [ 2200.129307] peak_pci 0000:05:01.0: can1 at 
> reg_base=0xffffc90000678400 cfg_base=0xffffc90000676000 irq=22 FW=1.2.0 
> should be updated
> 
> - or a single warning msg for the hardware device, something like:
> 
> [ 2200.129168] peak_pci 0000:05:01.0: Warning: FW v1.2.0 needs a 
> workaround; update is available

One per hardware device is enough.
"Warning: FW v1.2.0 workaround active; Please update device Firmeware."

...and a webpage displaying this message, so that you will find it.
Maybe even add a link to the website in the commit message.

> [ 2200.129168] peak_pci 0000:05:01.0: can0 at 
> reg_base=0xffffc90000678000 cfg_base=0xffffc90000676000 irq=22
> [ 2200.129307] peak_pci 0000:05:01.0: can1 at 
> reg_base=0xffffc90000678400 cfg_base=0xffffc90000676000 irq=22

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-20 11:15 [PATCH] can/peak_pci: fix FPGA potential frame loss issue Stephane Grosjean
2016-01-20 14:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2016-01-20 14:29   ` Stephane Grosjean
2016-01-20 14:33     ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
2016-01-21 17:51       ` Oliver Hartkopp
2016-01-22  9:10         ` Stephane Grosjean
2016-04-08  5:36           ` Oliver Hartkopp
2016-01-20 14:51 ` Andri Yngvason
2016-02-23 16:53 ` Andri Yngvason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=569F9AC5.6020706@pengutronix.de \
    --to=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.grosjean@peak-system.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).