From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@peak-system.com>,
ajneu <ajneu1@gmail.com>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug? -- NEVER getting controller-problem{back-to-error-active}
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:58:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57690FCB.70603@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eccb6d7c-b451-8f8a-d6c1-c2675002d424@peak-system.com>
Hello Stephane,
Am 21.06.2016 um 10:29 schrieb Stephane Grosjean:
> Hi,
>
> The reason of this:
>
> } else {
> /* no error bit (so, no error skb, back to active
> state) */
> dev->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
> pdev->bec.txerr = 0;
> pdev->bec.rxerr = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
> is given by the comment: AFAIR in these times, going (back) to
> ACTIVE_STATE was made like above, by the device driver itself.
Well, in the past we didn't care about *decreasing* state changes but
new driver should, and this does include the "back-to-error-active"
message, which is automatically generated by "change_state()". So far,
only a few driver are using that function:
$ grep -rl can_change_state .
./sja1000/sja1000.c
./usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_fd.c
./usb/kvaser_usb.c
./flexcan.c
./mscan/mscan.c
> The lower condition:
>
> /* allocate an skb to store the error frame */
> skb = alloc_can_err_skb(netdev, &cf);
> if (skb)
> can_change_state(netdev, cf, tx_state, rx_state);
>
> uses can_change_state() if and only if "skb" is not NULL, while there
> was no need of any skb to go (back) to ACTIVE_STATE.
>
> So, I suppose that the proposed change should also include something
> like the following one:
>
> /* allocate an skb to store the error frame */
> skb = alloc_can_err_skb(netdev, &cf);
> - if (skb)
> + if (skb || (new_state == CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE))
> can_change_state(netdev, cf, tx_state, rx_state);
can_change_state() should not be called if "skb" is NULL (because cf is
not valid).
Wolfgang.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-21 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-20 9:12 Bug? -- NEVER getting controller-problem{back-to-error-active} ajneu
2016-06-20 9:22 ` ajneu
2016-06-20 10:33 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2016-06-20 12:41 ` ajneu
2016-06-20 13:00 ` ajneu
2016-06-20 13:31 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2016-06-20 13:53 ` ajneu
2016-06-20 14:28 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2016-06-21 8:29 ` Stephane Grosjean
2016-06-21 9:58 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57690FCB.70603@grandegger.com \
--to=wg@grandegger.com \
--cc=ajneu1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.grosjean@peak-system.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox