From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfgang Grandegger Subject: Re: Clear errorframe Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:27:26 +0200 Message-ID: <578F6E2E.6090101@grandegger.com> References: <578F3882.30803@grandegger.com> <480d654d-1efd-fd5c-d091-cc766a7ddb7f@laure.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailproxy03.manitu.net ([217.11.48.151]:55106 "EHLO mailproxy03.manitu.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751693AbcGTM1b (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:27:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <480d654d-1efd-fd5c-d091-cc766a7ddb7f@laure.nz> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Laurenz , linux-can@vger.kernel.org Hello Laurenz, Am 20.07.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Laurenz: > Hi Wolfgang, > >> What CAN controller are you using? > This was an Ixxat USB-to-CAN V2. > > I tested with an PCAN-USB and it sends one > controller-problem{rx-error-warning,tx-error-warning} followed by one > controller-problem{rx-error-passive,tx-error-passive} in the same test. The exact message depends on the CAN controller. > So I can just ignore the repeated error? I will write to Ixxat support, > maybe they can change it. Yes, you could change your error message mask in case you are not interested in such messages. In general, it might be a better policy to treat such errors like bus errors allowing to enabled them on demand. Wolfgang.