From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DEBF185A for ; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706877927; cv=none; b=jqinCUuIiQWjATpQcKCdlwTyiqPxAZunEtFjEGVzeU4MerNo/xYNDPzgWHZ6Zz4pnkmPF34JC484CBPyW6imZAMCBLGhlFEGcxNmN4OB0a9Dyprnc3NAXz4h/3gII1YBjU5Mppau70qmnqzqn8qDqZwhuGRC/B+k1K1e8WMts2M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706877927; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XqeNK/FBug/xgsa8dI9kK6vco2N7uNjfbXrUthvegQM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SHdpINmFK13tjGeE5KC4QtJW75qxM97eyd27GNwoPycCIzXjEceu/VG+LaBUiWr8qCfNfZtfiK4cthxUxYAHC0geCX7y2Pt+C+qJLJhkAPax+ljA5u2s1EjL13IaYzWZd1gmuzenZnP2Vou6HdP7xS8SMFi05ICCWlnhDn2WRiA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=X+jTTNYt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="X+jTTNYt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1706877925; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XqeNK/FBug/xgsa8dI9kK6vco2N7uNjfbXrUthvegQM=; b=X+jTTNYtODYQc7Lc9tFWJrwl4Hw4V9rPRCcfUhz9sEEUG50DeE4wKs1NrSk3tIYmHevufN axbh1EoM4Z3ql+NCkuMs6VlRxAdhXhN0k8TMubXH9k1+EVpTSZyREFpw6rLN+x/ImK8eJC 8G2KpZQMLnQIsfXpRZqfr9okA32+/Qs= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-169-iwndiQb0MpywVP_CBbUWuQ-1; Fri, 02 Feb 2024 07:45:20 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iwndiQb0MpywVP_CBbUWuQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6653083BA85; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:45:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.194.111]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A56D2166B35; Fri, 2 Feb 2024 12:45:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Mikhail Golubev-Ciuchea , virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org Cc: Harald Mommer Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [RFC PATCH v3] virtio-can: Device specification. In-Reply-To: <87ttnemuon.fsf@redhat.com> Organization: "Red Hat GmbH, Sitz: Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 12, D-85630 Grasbrunn, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnchen=2C?= HRB 153243, =?utf-8?Q?Gesch=C3=A4ftsf=C3=BChrer=3A?= Ryan Barnhart, Charles Cachera, Michael O'Neill, Amy Ross" References: <20230609142243.199074-1-Mikhail.Golubev-Ciuchea@opensynergy.com> <87ttnemuon.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.37 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2024 13:45:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87eddvjaqt.fsf@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.6 On Mon, Jan 15 2024, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08 2024, Mikhail Golubev-Ciuchea wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> I kindly request a vote. >> >> Fixes: https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/issues/186 > > Oh, that has been a while... I believe that this still fits on top, > although it has conflicts with virtio-spi, but nothing that a bit of > fiddling can't sort out. > > The main problem is that we're currently in a bit of an unfortunate > situation regarding voting: There's still a twice-postponed migration of > the OASIS infrastructure coming up, and I don't want to risk the voting > period being affected by an outage... hopefully we'll get a new schedule > soon. > > In the meanwhile, if anyone could spare a few cycles looking at this, > it'd be appreciated. Nothing jumped out at me, but I'm not a CAN expert; > I'd be happy to open voting but for the looming migration issue. OK, I'll just go ahead and open a vote, no reason to drag this out further, and hopefully we're done by the time the migration _really_ happens...