From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Austin Schuh Subject: Re: [Socketcan-users] Error handling when writing socketcan drivers Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 16:00:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <501E82FD.2060505@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:57611 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751986Ab2HEXAP (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:00:15 -0400 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so2199659wgb.1 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:00:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <501E82FD.2060505@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" Hi Oliver, Thanks for your response! On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Hello Austin, > > first please move to the linux-can ML i put into CC for former discussions. It would probably be a good idea for someone to update the page at http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan/ to recommend that people use the linux-can list. > I hope that helped to get behind the ideas and concepts. > > Regards, > Oliver That along with reading the actual CAN spec sheet instead of just the micro-controller docs helped a lot. Hopefully I'm now set. Thanks again for your time, Austin Schuh