From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Robin van der Gracht <robin@protonic.nl>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can/j1939: hung inside rtnl_dellink()
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:51:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKg9mTaSxzBVpTVI@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50055a40-6fd9-468f-8e59-26d1b5b3c23d@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Hello Tetsuo,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025 at 03:51:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I made a minimized C reproducer for
>
> unregister_netdevice: waiting for vcan0 to become free. Usage count = 2
>
> problem at https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=881d65229ca4f9ae8c84 , and
> obtained some data using debug printk() patch. It seems that the cause is
> net/can/j1939/ does not handle NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification
> while net/can/j1939/ can directly call rtnl_dellink() via sendmsg().
Sorry for long delay and than you for your investigation!
> The minimized C reproducer is shown below.
....
> Therefore, I guess that either
>
> j1939_netdev_notify() is handling NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification
>
> or
>
> rtnl_dellink() can be called via sendmsg() despite the j1939 socket
> are in use
>
> is wrong. How to fix this problem?
I assume the first variant is correct. Can you please test following change:
--- a/net/can/j1939/main.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c
@@ -370,6 +370,7 @@
goto notify_done;
switch (msg) {
+ case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
case NETDEV_DOWN:
j1939_cancel_active_session(priv, NULL);
j1939_sk_netdev_event_netdown(priv);
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-22 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-16 6:51 can/j1939: hung inside rtnl_dellink() Tetsuo Handa
2025-08-22 9:51 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2025-08-22 10:23 ` Tetsuo Handa
2025-08-24 13:36 ` Tetsuo Handa
2025-08-25 14:07 ` [PATCH] can: j1939: implement NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification handler Tetsuo Handa
2025-09-05 8:29 ` Oleksij Rempel
2025-09-09 11:48 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKg9mTaSxzBVpTVI@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=robin@protonic.nl \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox