From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C35A028934F for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755791240; cv=none; b=VjG0GdkCvpjCYHGCm+BcPd+pqcxQGe28SrzzY34vOhdRDeHMyUP0LlBc27rhh9eDa9H/cL+0+nj99rUM4iQ6UKjIgNO/HtERSeRSzKSgT+LST6vQZ95AEJ2WpIebCZj+UdRQ9I+55qUiuXsITTxYHiq0QXYpv5eoHhxSRx2mH48= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755791240; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+MLZDrqKPzwmqjXfRANXh8FFXQvkOhkCda5UfEmZBmw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=POeVXizYIc6Q0TN0JK39m4f4xRj0WRGeirPb5WQQQ9102bG12qLupGDOzBY4z7G8UZbVQdvLWtL0Rqp9bPY/iPJLjgDT9D0jTaKFvkdYWNi0kxpbVbAKzu+NhdVgORbmIG6ThTmN7hQp7Y7cg1EHNXYCGc9XDoPdYxEOtfEJ68Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eeeFzYdL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eeeFzYdL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97FF4C4CEEB; Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:47:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755791240; bh=+MLZDrqKPzwmqjXfRANXh8FFXQvkOhkCda5UfEmZBmw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=eeeFzYdL8pJUGEcmiUR6Q4ZL4K5qaSG14wB9os/9I+E2YlwKkrkhYRciWeTwcyg7c +Ds4whumX+mizWvbb38dSX+I94MkLtTKWJQnB8ewmXxKjIAVsXbqV/eANgL8SJCU23 pLggU18FoCrXsWWRL3VhkjDBdNGIFNhYhF5E3K65otmsVmSiZ7Ui8FgH/CcOAdsgqM 9zonfWql8CfUXKY3m1l9gWsEHvGb22hHx9VrlqAnXDngpwmwrLsAO/ZEWO9cd4jEue 1GLdozvlIGK51stP/Ykda1zGLjlQ9+XhF8L9aTMg1Sycwa2k0DMg6p+jUzze1K2Rxf Zn0IGpoAwP17Q== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:47:18 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: canxl: add CANXL_PMS flag To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?St=C3=A9phane_Grosjean?= , Marc Kleine-Budde , Robert Nawrath References: <20250729-can_tms-v1-1-21d0195d1dd0@kernel.org> <64bf8703-c80c-4a96-a5ad-0efc48bf0541@hartkopp.net> Content-Language: en-US From: Vincent Mailhol Autocrypt: addr=mailhol@kernel.org; keydata= xjMEZluomRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAf+/PnQvy9LCWNSJLbhc+AOUsR2cNVonvxhDk/KcW7FvN JFZpbmNlbnQgTWFpbGhvbCA8bWFpbGhvbEBrZXJuZWwub3JnPsKZBBMWCgBBFiEE7Y9wBXTm fyDldOjiq1/riG27mcIFAmdfB/kCGwMFCQp/CJcFCwkIBwICIgIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcC F4AACgkQq1/riG27mcKBHgEAygbvORJOfMHGlq5lQhZkDnaUXbpZhxirxkAHwTypHr4A/joI 2wLjgTCm5I2Z3zB8hqJu+OeFPXZFWGTuk0e2wT4JzjgEZx4y8xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQJrb YZzu0JG5w8gxE6EtQe6LmxKMqP6EyR33sA+BR9pLAwEIB8J+BBgWCgAmFiEE7Y9wBXTmfyDl dOjiq1/riG27mcIFAmceMvMCGwwFCQPCZwAACgkQq1/riG27mcJU7QEA+LmpFhfQ1aij/L8V zsZwr/S44HCzcz5+jkxnVVQ5LZ4BANOCpYEY+CYrld5XZvM8h2EntNnzxHHuhjfDOQ3MAkEK In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Oliver, On 18/08/2025 at 21:35, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Hi Vincent, > > On 30.07.25 16:15, Vincent Mailhol wrote: >> On Tue. 29 Jul. 2025 at 03:20, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > >>> Btw. while we are at it: I would suggest for a name change of >>> >>> CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TRX >>> >>> to >>> >>> CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TMS >>> >>> as it makes clear how the controller should manage the PWM mode. >>> >>> "CAN_CTRLMODE_XL_TRX" would mean "there is a CAN XL PWM enabled transceiver" >>> available which tells nothing about whether the PWM mode is used or not. >> >> Ack. I have the same opinion. >> > > We are already in 6.17-rc2 and I would definitely like to have the CAN XL driver > support finalized in this net-next merge window phase. > > What is your plan? Do you have an updated patch set to be posted for the > discussion? I uploaded my current WIP here: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mailhol/linux.git/log/?h=b4/canxl-netlink As you will be able to see, most of the features are here. Now, I am trying to think of all the edge cases and make sure that any incorrect configuration is correctly rejected. I am just sharing this to reassure everyone on the progress. The patches are not yet ready for discussion. You can have a look if you want, but no need to do a review as I am still making changes. Yours sincerely, Vincent Mailhol