From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sven Geggus <lists@fuchsschwanzdomain.de>
Subject: OT: Comprehensive Experimental Analyses of Automotive Attack Surfaces
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:35:26 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <jeotsu$2vv$1@ultimate100.geggus.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Return-path: <linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.gnuher.de ([78.47.12.54]:41632 "EHLO mail.gnuher.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752610Ab2AMJyU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-can@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 13 Jan 2012 04:54:20 -0500
Received: from ultimate100.geggus.net ([2a01:198:297:1::1])
	by mail.gnuher.de (envelope-from
	<news@geggus.net>)
	with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72)
	id 1RldXl-0003cr-Aw
	for linux-can@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:35:29 +0100
Received: from news  by ultimate100.geggus.net (envelope-from
	<news@geggus.net>)
	with local (Exim 4.72)
	id 1RldXi-0000wi-P9
	for linux-can@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:35:26 +0100
Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-can.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org

While not particular a CANbus topic (at least not only) but probably of
interest to subscribers of this list anyway:

http://www.autosec.org/pubs/cars-usenixsec2011.pdf

At least the vulnerable "PassThru" device is almost certainly using Lin=
ux
CAN stack which is of course not the cause of the security problem ;)

Regards

Sven

--=20
Unix is simple and coherent, but it takes a genius =E2=80=93 or at any =
rate a
programmer =E2=80=93 to understand and appreciate the simplicity
(Dennis M. Ritchie)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web