Re: Parsing j1939 from raw candump

[Giox79 <giovanniparodi79@gmail.com>]

Hi Kurt

Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck <at> eia.be> writes:

> 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Please note that I have the whole j1939 standard and that 
> > > > > at present time I can't integrate the j1939 canutils in linux 
> > > > > kernel because I should use for other kind of constraints 
> > > > > a 2.6 linux kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > which specific 2.6 one did it start from (like 2.6.28 or 2.6.35 or ...)
> > > 
> > > The version is 2.6.35.3
> > I'll take a look if backporting linux-j1939 to 2.6.35 is feasible.
> > Btw, I still run a platform with 2.6.25 _and_ a backported j1939.
> > But 2.6.25 lacks some infrastructure, and I had to come up with less
> > elegant procfs tunables to replace iproute2 commands.
> > The rest of the API (i.e. socket interface) is equal.
> > 
> > I'll take a look...
> 
> Giovanni,
> 
> I've put a branch j1939-v2.6.35 on
> http://gitorious.org/~kurt-vd/linux-can/linux-can-j1939
> 
> You may want to give it a try.
> The iproute2 package does not need backporting AFAIK, i.e. you can use
> the one you like (with j1939 support).
> 
> If this works, it enables you to play with the j1939 stack on your PC also.
>

Thank you for your help.
I will give it a try during the weekend.
I don't know how to thank you. I will try using it and I will let you know.
I hope that Monday I will be able to provide some good news.
Have a nice day and a happy Easter
Giovanni