linux-can.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Andrysek <richard.andrysek@rg-mechatronics.com>
To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:50:33 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20131205T164221-222@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1385334220-31887-1-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de

Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl <at> pengutronix.de> writes:

> 
> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan <at> hartkopp.net>
> 
> It has been reported that on PREEMPT_RT enabled system the peak SJA1000
> hardware can trigger "irq X: nobody cared" errors.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue that the sja1000_interrupt() function may have
> returned IRQ_NONE without processing the optional pre_irq() and post_irq()
> function before. Further the irq processing counter 'n' is moved to the end of
> the while statement to return correct IRQ_[NONE|HANDLED] values at error
> conditions.
> 
> Reported-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg <at> grandegger.com>
> Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg <at> grandegger.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan <at> hartkopp.net>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl <at> pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes since v5: make it one patch again.
> 
>  drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
> index 7164a99..f17c301 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
>  <at>  <at>  -494,20 +494,20  <at>  <at>  irqreturn_t
sja1000_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	uint8_t isrc, status;
>  	int n = 0;
> 
> -	/* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
> -	if (priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
> -		return IRQ_NONE;
> -
>  	if (priv->pre_irq)
>  		priv->pre_irq(priv);
> 
> +	/* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
> +	if (priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	while ((isrc = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IR)) &&
>  	       (n < SJA1000_MAX_IRQ)) {
> -		n++;
> +
>  		status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
>  		/* check for absent controller due to hw unplug */
>  		if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
> -			return IRQ_NONE;
> +			goto out;
> 
>  		if (isrc & IRQ_WUI)
>  			netdev_warn(dev, "wakeup interrupt\n");
>  <at>  <at>  -535,7 +535,7  <at>  <at>  irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int
irq, void *dev_id)
>  				status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
>  				/* check for absent controller */
>  				if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
> -					return IRQ_NONE;
> +					goto out;
>  			}
>  		}
>  		if (isrc & (IRQ_DOI | IRQ_EI | IRQ_BEI | IRQ_EPI | IRQ_ALI)) {
>  <at>  <at>  -543,8 +543,9  <at>  <at>  irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int
irq, void *dev_id)
>  			if (sja1000_err(dev, isrc, status))
>  				break;
>  		}
> +		n++;
>  	}
> -
> +out:
>  	if (priv->post_irq)
>  		priv->post_irq(priv);
> 

I've used a patch and now I see an another effect.
I see with a dmesg like this: [16773.935134] peak_pci 0000:03:0b.0 can0:
data overrun interrupt
 
	1)Why there are reported as a frame error, by calling ifconfig –a?
        $ sudo dmesg | grep "data overrun interrupt" | wc
          17     136    1122

        ~$ sudo ifconfig can0
         can0      Link encap:UNSPEC  HWaddr
00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00
          UP RUNNING NOARP  MTU:16  Metric:1
          RX packets:12711052 errors:17 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:17
          TX packets:15023217 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
          RX bytes:101688416 (96.9 MiB)  TX bytes:109206486 (104.1 MiB)
          Interrupt:19


          Rx errors:17  == wc over "data overrun interrupt": 17 == RX frame
: 17.
 
	2) How the data overrun can happen, if the can bus load  is ~25%?
	 
	$ sudo cat /proc/net/can/stats
	[sudo] password for ran:
 
  1421819 transmitted frames (TXF)
  2606493 received frames (RXF)
   473873 matched frames (RXMF)
 
       18 % total match ratio (RXMR)
     2400 frames/s total tx rate (TXR)
     4400 frames/s total rx rate (RXR)
 
       18 % current match ratio (CRXMR)
     2400 frames/s current tx rate (CTXR)
     4400 frames/s current rx rate (CRXR)
 
       18 % max match ratio (MRXMR)
     2427 frames/s max tx rate (MTXR)
     4427 frames/s max rx rate (MRXR)
 
        4 current receive list entries (CRCV)
        9 maximum receive list entries (MRCV)
 
	        2 statistic resets (STR)






  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-05 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-24 23:03 [PATCH v6] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-11-25  8:54 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-11-25 18:12   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-11-25 22:05   ` Austin Schuh
2013-12-09 19:48   ` Austin Schuh
2013-12-09 21:07     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-12-09 23:50       ` Austin Schuh
2013-12-05 15:50 ` Richard Andrysek [this message]
2013-12-05 17:50   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-12-05 19:37     ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-05 20:26       ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-12-06  9:27         ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-06  9:56           ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-12-06 10:32             ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-06 18:32               ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-12-09  9:29                 ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-06 10:12           ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-12-06 10:57             ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-06 11:45               ` arbitration lost error reporting (was: Re: [PATCH v6] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value) Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-12-06 12:02                 ` arbitration lost error reporting Oliver Hartkopp
2013-12-06 12:16                   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-12-06 13:21                     ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-06 13:23                       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-12-06 17:59                   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2013-12-07 13:13                     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2013-12-09  9:01                     ` Richard Andrysek
2013-12-09 10:32                       ` Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20131205T164221-222@post.gmane.org \
    --to=richard.andrysek@rg-mechatronics.com \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).