From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wouter van herpen Subject: Re: =?utf-8?b?Y19jYW46?= wrong frame order reception Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <2323199.vffRdFDsB5@ws-stein> <7234338.9RqiOdiLOY@ws-stein> <533B067A.3030609@hartkopp.net> <1451869.V7QBi99RiY@ws-stein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44481 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754243AbbJUJZQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 05:25:16 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zopdp-0007P1-5p for linux-can@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:05 +0200 Received: from prodrive.fiberspeed.claranet.nl ([prodrive.fiberspeed.claranet.nl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:05 +0200 Received: from wouter.van.herpen by prodrive.fiberspeed.claranet.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:25:05 +0200 Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-can@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I am currently working on the Intel atom platform with EG20T. Using the c_can driver from the main line 4.1.10 kernel sources, I still see frames received in a swapped order. It looks like all the patches mentioned in the list above are already applied in this main line c_can driver. Is the frame order swapping still a known issue? Are there any additional patches regarding this issue that I'm not aware off?