From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Cunhao Lu" <1579567540@qq.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 3/5] can: rockchip_canfd: cancel bus-off restart before closing the device
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 13:35:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171362@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-rockchip-canfd-restart-close-v3-3-f0eb41090242@qq.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] pm: async pm_runtime_put() before pm_runtime_disable() leaves hardware active
--
commit 614c95a9bb5ead8b95b8b6a430415575bc664f43
Author: Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com>
can: rockchip_canfd: cancel bus-off restart before closing the device
This commit fixes a race condition during device close by cancelling the
bus-off restart work early. It adds synchronous cancellation to ndo_stop()
while resources are still available, preventing late restarts. The patch
also improves interrupt handling and RX offload enablement.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
> index 37c1c22c40c9f..4b3db07242395 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rockchip/rockchip_canfd-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -758,6 +775,7 @@ static int rkcanfd_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct rkcanfd_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>
> + close_candev_cancel_restart_sync(ndev);
> netif_stop_queue(ndev);
>
> rkcanfd_chip_interrupts_disable(priv);
[Severity: Medium]
Later in this function, pm_runtime_put(ndev->dev.parent) is called.
Since pm_runtime_put() queues an asynchronous idle request, it can leave the
hardware active.
When rmmod is executed, the removal path calls rkcanfd_remove() which calls
rkcanfd_unregister():
static inline void rkcanfd_unregister(struct rkcanfd_priv *priv)
{
struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
unregister_candev(ndev);
pm_runtime_disable(ndev->dev.parent);
}
unregister_candev() synchronously brings the interface down by calling
rkcanfd_stop(), followed immediately by pm_runtime_disable() in
rkcanfd_unregister().
Because pm_runtime_disable() detects and cancels the pending async
idle/suspend work queued by pm_runtime_put() in rkcanfd_stop(), the device is
never suspended, leaving the hardware clocks enabled and powered on
indefinitely after the driver is removed.
Could this be a regression? Should pm_runtime_put_sync() be used in
rkcanfd_stop() instead of pm_runtime_put() to ensure the hardware is suspended
before pm_runtime_disable() cancels the work?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014-rockchip-canfd-restart-close-v3-0-f0eb41090242@qq.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 13:24 [PATCH net v3 0/5] can: fix bus-off restart and device close races Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-14 13:24 ` [PATCH net v3 1/5] can: dev: prevent bus-off recovery when the interface is not running Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-14 13:24 ` [PATCH net v3 2/5] can: dev: add close_candev_cancel_restart_sync() Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-14 13:24 ` [PATCH net v3 3/5] can: rockchip_canfd: cancel bus-off restart before closing the device Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-14 13:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 13:24 ` [PATCH net v3 4/5] can: rockchip_canfd: prevent timestamp work from rearming after bus-off Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-14 13:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 13:24 ` [PATCH net v3 5/5] can: rockchip_canfd: serialize TX with bus-off and restart Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171362@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=1579567540@qq.com \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox