Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): check for overflow flag if SKB allocation fails
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 18:50:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-184352@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025-gs_usb-fixes-v1-3-f74ebbd4da36@pengutronix.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] can: gs_usb: wrong rx_errors increment in gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback()
--

commit de6c839020ea7849981f0dbb5e199313eeae8ce2
Author: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): check for overflow flag if SKB allocation fails

When SKB allocation fails in gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(), this commit
updates the RX statistics and jumps to check for the GS_CAN_FLAG_OVERFLOW
flag in the host frame before resubmitting the URB.

> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
> index 985d6a9113d96..5687544af99c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
> @@ -673,8 +673,12 @@ static void gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  	if (hf->echo_id == GS_HOST_FRAME_ECHO_ID_RX) { /* normal rx */
>  		if (hf->flags & GS_CAN_FLAG_FD) {
>  			skb = alloc_canfd_skb(netdev, &cfd);
> -			if (!skb)
> -				goto resubmit_urb;
> +			if (!skb) {
> +				netdev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> +				netdev->stats.rx_errors++;
> +
> +				goto check_overflow;
> +			}
>  
>  			cfd->can_id = le32_to_cpu(hf->can_id);
>  			cfd->len = data_length;
> @@ -686,8 +690,12 @@ static void gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  			memcpy(cfd->data, hf->canfd->data, data_length);
>  		} else {
>  			skb = alloc_can_skb(netdev, &cf);
> -			if (!skb)
> -				goto resubmit_urb;
> +			if (!skb) {
> +				netdev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> +				netdev->stats.rx_errors++;
> +
> +				goto check_overflow;
> +			}
>  
>  			cf->can_id = le32_to_cpu(hf->can_id);
>  			can_frame_set_cc_len(cf, hf->can_dlc, dev->can.ctrlmode);
> @@ -728,6 +736,7 @@ static void gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  		netif_wake_queue(netdev);
>  	}
>  
> +check_overflow:
>  	if (hf->flags & GS_CAN_FLAG_OVERFLOW) {
>  		stats->rx_over_errors++;
>  		stats->rx_errors++;

[Severity: Medium]
Should gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback() only increment stats->rx_dropped
(and not netdev->stats.rx_errors) when alloc_canfd_skb() or
alloc_can_skb() returns NULL?

In standard net_device_stats accounting (and in other CAN drivers under
drivers/net/can/), a host SKB allocation failure is a drop due to lack of
host memory rather than a link or hardware receive error, so only
rx_dropped is incremented.

Furthermore, if GS_CAN_FLAG_OVERFLOW is also set on the host frame when
allocation fails, jumping to check_overflow increments stats->rx_errors a
second time for the same frame:

    check_overflow:
        if (hf->flags & GS_CAN_FLAG_OVERFLOW) {
            stats->rx_over_errors++;
            stats->rx_errors++;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261025-gs_usb-fixes-v1-0-f74ebbd4da36@pengutronix.de?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-25 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-25 18:35 [PATCH 0/4] gs_usb: fixes Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-25 18:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] can: gs_usb: gs_can_start_xmit(): don't leak uninitialized memory over USB Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-25 18:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_probe(): init netdev completely before register_candev() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-25 18:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27  7:37   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27  9:26     ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-25 18:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): check for overflow flag if SKB allocation fails Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-10-25 18:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27  7:37   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-25 18:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): add missing call to can_rx_offload_irq_finish Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-184352@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox