From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chaosheng Qu" <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v7 2/4] can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 07:04:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208485@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179410166345.60581.5430129940541091934@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] can: j1939: missing txtimer cancel before
j1939_session_cancel()
- [Medium] can: j1939: session ref leak in j1939_session_cancel() on
rxtimer race
- [Low] can: j1939: missing Fixes trailer for EDPO bounds check
--
commit 1f6785035506d85ce93ce6a036332f472884137d
Author: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
> can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number
>
> ETP.CM_DPO is peer controlled and its packet number is accepted without any
> validation. It names the packet a transmission window starts at, and
> j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one() places incoming data at "dat[0] - 1 + pkt.dpo", so a
> value past the end of the message moves pkt.dpo beyond the reassembled
> buffer.
>
> The transfer still completes normally in that case. With
> pkt.dpo == pkt.total, a closing ETP.DT frame with dat[0] == 0 evaluates to
> packet pkt.total - 1, which is the last in-order packet, so pkt.rx reaches
> pkt.total and the receiver emits its own EOMA. The local loopback of that
> EOMA runs j1939_session_completed(), which asks j1939_session_skb_get() for
> offset "pkt.dpo * 7" -- one full packet past the end of the queued skb --
> gets NULL, and passes it straight to j1939_sk_recv(), which dereferences
> oskb->sk.
>
> Reject an EDPO that names a packet at or past pkt.total and abort the
> session. The check has to be ">=" and not ">": pkt.total is a packet
> count,
> so the last valid packet is pkt.total - 1.
>
> The abort code depends on the role. A receiver rejects a bad offset with
> J1939_XTP_ABORT_BAD_EDPO_OFFSET, which the comment next to the definition
> describes as "Bad EDPO offset" and which had no callers. A transmitter
> only
> builds an EDPO from pkt.tx_acked, which comes from the responder's
> ETP.CM_CTS, so an out-of-range value there is an oversized CTS and is
> reported as J1939_XTP_ABORT_ECTS_TOO_BIG.
>
> Bounding the CTS packet number in j1939_xtp_rx_cts_one() is a separate
> change; this one only stops the value from being used as an offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaosheng Qu <quchaosheng000406@163.com>
[Severity: Low]
Since this fixes a NULL pointer dereference present since J1939 support was
introduced, should it include a Fixes tag:
Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
> diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> index 590a04c453b56..b0e62822b56e4 100644
> --- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> +++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
> @@ -1849,14 +1849,43 @@ static void j1939_xtp_rx_dpo_one(struct j1939_session *session,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> const u8 *dat = skb->data;
> + unsigned int dpo;
>
> if (j1939_xtp_rx_cmd_bad_pgn(session, skb))
> return;
>
> netdev_dbg(session->priv->ndev, "%s: 0x%p\n", __func__, session);
>
> + dpo = j1939_etp_ctl_to_packet(dat);
> +
> + /* ETP.CM_DPO is peer controlled. j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one() places data at
> + * "dat[0] - 1 + pkt.dpo", so a value at or past pkt.total moves pkt.dpo
> + * beyond the reassembled buffer. The transfer still completes: with
> + * pkt.dpo == pkt.total a closing ETP.DT with dat[0] == 0 evaluates to
> + * the last in-order packet, so pkt.rx reaches pkt.total and the receiver
> + * emits its own EOMA. The loopback of that EOMA runs
> + * j1939_session_completed(), which asks j1939_session_skb_get() for a
> + * packet past the end of the queued skb, gets NULL, and passes it to
> + * j1939_sk_recv().
> + *
> + * pkt.total is a packet count, so the last valid packet is
> + * pkt.total - 1 and the check has to be ">=".
> + */
> + if (dpo >= session->pkt.total) {
> + if (session->transmission) {
> + /* A transmitter only builds an EDPO from pkt.tx_acked,
> + * which comes from the responder's ETP.CM_CTS, so an
> + * out-of-range value there is an oversized CTS.
> + */
> + j1939_session_cancel(session, J1939_XTP_ABORT_ECTS_TOO_BIG);
> + } else {
> + j1939_session_cancel(session, J1939_XTP_ABORT_BAD_EDPO_OFFSET);
> + }
> + return;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does aborting here without calling j1939_session_timers_cancel(session) leave
session->txtimer armed?
j1939_session_cancel() only cancels session->rxtimer, which is why the other
receive-path abort handlers (j1939_xtp_rx_cts_one(),
j1939_xtp_rx_rts_session_active() and j1939_xtp_rx_dat_one()) call
j1939_session_timers_cancel(session) first.
On the transmitter path, after j1939_tp_txtimer() sends ETP.CM_DPO with an
out-of-range pkt.tx, j1939_session_tx_dat() sees NULL from
j1939_session_skb_get_by_offset() and returns -ENOBUFS, so j1939_tp_txtimer()
re-arms session->txtimer for 10..25 ms. When the looped-back ETP.CM_DPO then
hits this check, session->txtimer stays active on the aborting session, retries
up to J1939_XTP_TX_RETRY_LIMIT and overwrites session->err with -ENETUNREACH
(or on a receiver session, transmits CTS or EOMA and clobbers the abort
timeout via j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout()).
[Severity: Medium]
Can calling j1939_session_cancel() here race with a second cancel or timeout
update to double-arm session->rxtimer and leak a struct j1939_session
reference?
In j1939_session_cancel() (modified in commit "can: j1939: arm the abort timer
under the session list lock"), j1939_session_rxtimer_cancel() runs before
taking active_session_list_lock, and then hrtimer_start(&session->rxtimer, ...)
runs unconditionally under the lock whenever abort_sent is true or
session->state == J1939_SESSION_WAITING_ABORT:
CPU0 CPU1
j1939_xtp_rx_dpo_one() j1939_xtp_rx_dpo_one()
j1939_session_cancel() j1939_session_cancel()
j1939_session_rxtimer_cancel() j1939_session_rxtimer_cancel()
j1939_session_list_lock()
__j1939_session_cancel()
state = WAITING_ABORT
j1939_session_get()
hrtimer_start(&rxtimer, ...)
j1939_session_list_unlock()
j1939_session_list_lock()
/* state == WAITING_ABORT */
j1939_session_get()
hrtimer_start(&rxtimer, ...)
<-- overwrites armed timer, leaks ref
j1939_tp_set_rxtimeout() also rearms session->rxtimer without holding
active_session_list_lock, so it can likewise arm session->rxtimer between
j1939_session_rxtimer_cancel() and hrtimer_start(). The leaked kref prevents
j1939_session_destroy() from running, leaking the session and its tracked
net_device reference and hanging unregister_netdevice().
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/179410166344.60581.3898011861151549156@163.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 1:34 [PATCH net v7 0/4] can: j1939: fix the abort timer and bound EDPO Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 2/4] can: j1939: validate the EDPO packet number Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-11 7:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 4/4] can: j1939: reject a CTS that names more packets than the message has Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 1/4] can: j1939: arm the abort timer under the session list lock Chaosheng Qu
2026-11-11 6:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 1:34 ` [PATCH net v7 3/4] can: j1939: drop the message when the reassembled skb is gone Chaosheng Qu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208485@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=quchaosheng000406@163.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox