Linux CAN drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
	"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
	"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:51:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208910@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110115112.3807247-9-mkl@pengutronix.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: duplicate reset-names:
  false in allOf
--

commit 673edc90f4112a3f288e1450d2ac3c1b416dd41b
Author: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level

This commit constrains the top-level resets property to 1 or 2 items,
removes redundant maxItems: 2 entries in per-variant conditionals, and adds
reset-names: false to the renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd and
renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd conditional block.

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261001060825.53335-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
> index bbaaef8f4282e..1a7a9ce45e977 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -231,6 +232,8 @@ allOf:
>          resets:
>            maxItems: 1
>  
> +        reset-names: false

[Severity: Low]
Does this duplicate the reset-names: false constraint already present in a
second if-then block for the same compatible strings further down in allOf?

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml:
  - if:
      properties:
        compatible:
          contains:
            enum:
              - renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd
              - renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd
    then:
      required:
        - resets
      properties:
        reset-names: false

These two identical if conditions for renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd and
renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd could be merged, or the binding could be split into
separate schema documents to avoid accumulating fragmented per-compatible
conditionals.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110115112.3807247-1-mkl@pengutronix.de?part=8

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-11 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 11:41 [PATCH net-next 0/12] pull-request: can-next 2026-11-10 Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G3S SoC Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] can: rcar_canfd: Fix typos in macro names Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] can: rcar_canfd: Allow the CAN FD clock to be sourced from fck Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] can: rcar_canfd: Do not set registers selecting the CAN mode Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] can: rcar_canfd: Check can_clk request for errors Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] can: rcar_canfd: Use DT clock names in the probe message Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:01   ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Simplify renesas,no-can-fd description Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] can: rcar_canfd: Document that RZ/G3S has no Classical CAN mode Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G3L SoC Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3L Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208910@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox