From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH can-next v7 5/6] can: gs_usb: fix hardware timestamp state for mixed channels
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 15:31:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-214713@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261114-gs_usb-fixes-v7-5-58b6341b1c08@pengutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] can: gs_usb: invalid context-analysis lock annotations in
timestamp helpers
--
commit ac918b2b251bb4e9c64c17ed5a99e1135d686016
Author: Shuangpeng Bai <shuangpeng.kernel@gmail.com>
can: gs_usb: fix hardware timestamp state for mixed channels
This commit initializes the hardware timestamping infrastructure during probe
whenever any channel supports GS_CAN_FEATURE_HW_TIMESTAMP, and starts or stops
it when the first or last channel is opened or closed.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c b/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
> index 980c4a748c946..b7780a23eff3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/usb/gs_usb.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -405,6 +411,7 @@ static int gs_cmd_reset(struct gs_can *dev)
>
> static inline int gs_usb_get_timestamp(const struct gs_usb *parent,
> u32 *timestamp_p)
> + __must_not_hold(parent->tc_lock)
> {
> __le32 timestamp;
> int rc;
> @@ -423,7 +430,16 @@ static inline int gs_usb_get_timestamp(const struct gs_usb *parent,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static u64 gs_usb_timestamp_read(struct cyclecounter *cc) __must_hold(&dev->tc_lock)
> +static u64 gs_usb_timestamp_read_initial(struct cyclecounter *cc)
> + __must_hold(&container_of(cc, struct gs_usb, cc)->tc_lock)
> +{
> + const struct gs_usb *parent = container_of(cc, struct gs_usb, cc);
> +
> + return parent->timestamp_initial;
> +}
> +
> +static u64 gs_usb_timestamp_read(struct cyclecounter *cc)
> + __must_hold(&container_of(cc, struct gs_usb, cc)->tc_lock)
[Severity: Low]
Does building with CONFIG_WARN_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS_ALL=y fail on these lock
annotations?
When WARN_CONTEXT_ANALYSIS is enabled, __must_hold() expands to a Clang
requires_capability attribute on the function declarator at file scope, where
the statement expression inside container_of() is rejected as a compile error.
Calling lockdep_assert_held(&parent->tc_lock) inside the function body avoids
this, and gs_usb_get_timestamp() also needs a pointer
(__must_not_hold(&parent->tc_lock)) rather than passing parent->tc_lock by
value.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261114-gs_usb-fixes-v7-0-58b6341b1c08@pengutronix.de?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 15:17 [PATCH can-next v7 0/6] gs_usb: fixes Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 1/6] can: gs_usb: gs_make_candev(): check can_rx_offload_add_manual() return value Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 2/6] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_probe(): init netdev completely before register_candev() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 3/6] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): check for overflow flag if SKB allocation fails Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 4/6] can: gs_usb: gs_usb_receive_bulk_callback(): add missing call to can_rx_offload_irq_finish Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 5/6] can: gs_usb: fix hardware timestamp state for mixed channels Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-14 15:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-14 15:17 ` [PATCH can-next v7 6/6] can: gs_usb: properly shut down timestamp worker Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-214713@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox