From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx.manguebit.com (mx.manguebit.com [167.235.159.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19AA02E3386 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.235.159.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742776628; cv=none; b=I+irKIjtKys0E9J+NwDWQqSdzW6PBO1AFJgSL+uSfPhgDFEQLnOo6xwrPaoTpZ3Rhb45klYBGq6651ItAPdoC5c1B2ONZp5EWmm2nCPD7i8LaTipQ30UgM//yekfuI+QbqvrKtcQ18f5SZXduQEj9QB+iuIE0aq3iv07D7ZN+a0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742776628; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tk0BMa5mAEYMoElv062SuTMtF1MvPaW7MAHquygtetk=; h=Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dDYE0Y7LlAgTf5dO94W9AHkHtSPM56gWbvcH7bdLf+JT09/klgOlvsvse3VrUHGSc6sq+6+TRg09xGYn0hRfBqcAPiLKCNq4WcPdxQAsviOilG37l1UzbLmfcIOV8AECJM/K7VCqJEHlYZ3ecBP7z8bg+5PEJ5RzzEpsZnPyHf0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manguebit.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manguebit.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manguebit.com header.i=@manguebit.com header.b=QSJdAKOm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=167.235.159.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manguebit.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manguebit.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manguebit.com header.i=@manguebit.com header.b="QSJdAKOm" Message-ID: <02d5d5dccd2fa592baa2d16020d049cd@manguebit.com> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manguebit.com; s=dkim; t=1742776619; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tk0BMa5mAEYMoElv062SuTMtF1MvPaW7MAHquygtetk=; b=QSJdAKOmkzp5L2o0rDnoMZW49hUDRrSiDFxNOW15vHEhy1dHbUksKJ5Vr4ETBOjsgqDJ/g /zwidrE1cI8nfyf2BPY3OMHK4hfIYTLYjv7wWBzqft/LLAZZCfojnshANU+p2TbL6CcPux XfUPxKglIslX0r+JLkX5/m02SHB/v49KV9pya+tWDt04nmSpXUhNT/2F7JKCGt+XvDtQZl Uffsvm57dxPEOIqC7Bp4PJxlrcVdgGT+u/GBHISSx3QqlM5VcFxwt/Zk39t7BOtakZnsqA 0Fqp+zDJdtX6er2XyhlvqAdcqklT8ZjZzoOPCx+XvaFDWY56NqN1pfB8dE9fIw== From: Paulo Alcantara To: Pali =?utf-8?Q?Roh=C3=A1r?= , Steve French Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression with getcifsacl(1) in v6.14-rc1 In-Reply-To: <20250323103647.rsex63eilfdziqaj@pali> References: <2bdf635d3ebd000480226ee8568c32fb@manguebit.com> <20250212220743.a22f3mizkdcf53vv@pali> <92b554876923f730500a4dc734ef8e77@manguebit.com> <20250213184155.sqdkac7spzm437ei@pali> <20250323103647.rsex63eilfdziqaj@pali> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 21:36:56 -0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pali Roh=C3=A1r writes: > Hello, I would like to ask, how you handled this regression? Have you > taken this my fix to address it? Or is it going to be addresses in other > way? It's already fixed in cifs-utils-7.2 by commit 8b4b6e459d2a ("getcifsacl: fix return code check for getting full ACL").