From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "James Johnston" Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 00/22] Richacls Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 01:20:15 -0000 Message-ID: <036701d1b491$44b3b2a0$ce1b17e0$@codenest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , , , , , "'Jeremy Allison'" , "'Volker Lendecke'" , "'Andreas Gruenbacher'" , "'Christoph Hellwig'" Return-path: Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:18:10AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:02:33AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > > > What more can I do to finally get this merged? > > > > While I am not the one to comment on kernel specifics, from a pure Samba > > user space perspective let me say: We need this. NOW. > > +1 from me. This is something that many vendors need > and have needed for a very long time. Getting this > in will allow *large* amounts of existing storage to > be migrated to Linux. As a "mere" end-user of SAMBA, +1 from me also... It's my understanding that this patch set would help eliminate the need for hacks like vfs_acl_xattr that store ACLs in extended attributes that only SAMBA understands. If the file system itself can respect the ACLs that seems like a lot cleaner solution. James