From: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
To: Diego Oliva <diego@bynar.io>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>, Bharath SM <bharathsm@microsoft.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] smb: client: reject out-of-bounds DataOffset in CIFSSMBRead()
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:15:23 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0abfb2d2f99e54aceac4cea63947b65a@manguebit.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831125045.479576-1-diego@bynar.io>
Diego Oliva <diego@bynar.io> writes:
> The SMB1 synchronous read helper CIFSSMBRead() validates the server's
> DataLength against CIFSMaxBufSize and the caller's count, but never
> validates DataOffset. The copy source is formed as
>
> &pSMBr->hdr.Protocol + le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataOffset)
>
> and memcpy()'d for DataLength bytes with no check that the
> [DataOffset, DataOffset + DataLength) range lies within the response
> actually received from the server.
>
> A malicious or compromised SMB1 server can return a short response
> carrying an in-range DataLength and a large DataOffset, driving the
> source pointer past the end of the response buffer. The memcpy() then
> copies adjacent kernel heap into the caller's read buffer (information
> disclosure), or reads unmapped memory and oopses (denial of service).
> SMB1 is not negotiated by default; reaching this code requires an
> explicit vers=1.0 mount.
>
> Both DataOffset and the received response length recorded in
> rsp_iov.iov_len are relative to the start of the SMB header, so reject
> the response unless DataOffset + DataLength fits within that length,
> using overflow-safe arithmetic, before forming the source pointer.
>
> While here, make data_length unsigned. It holds a length derived from
> an unsigned on-the-wire field and is only ever compared against
> unsigned quantities. This is not required by the validation added
> above, but it matches what the variable represents.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Bynario AI
> Signed-off-by: Diego Oliva <diego@bynar.io>
> ---
> v2:
> - make data_length unsigned, as suggested by Namjae Jeon
> - rebased on current upstream
> - v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20260828150203.1419003-1-diego@bynar.io/
>
> Note for backporting: this uses the smb_EIO2() tracepoint helper added
> in v6.19 with f80ac7eda1cf5. For older kernels, the call can be
> replaced with a simple return of -EIO.
>
> fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> fs/smb/client/trace.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c b/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
> index f5aad5f61dce..b89d49395362 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c
> @@ -1720,7 +1720,8 @@ CIFSSMBRead(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_io_parms *io_parms,
> if (rc) {
> cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in read = %d\n", rc);
> } else {
> - int data_length = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataLengthHigh);
> + unsigned int data_length = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataLengthHigh);
> + __u16 data_offset = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataOffset);
Shouldn't you also validate the minimum response size so that you can
safely dereference the above fields? E.g.,
if (rsp_iov.iov_len < tcon->ses->server->read_rsp_size) {
rc = smb_EIO(...);
*nbytes = 0;
} else {
unsigned int data_length = le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataLengthHigh);
...
}
> data_length = data_length << 16;
> data_length += le16_to_cpu(pSMBr->DataLength);
> *nbytes = data_length;
> @@ -1733,9 +1734,15 @@ CIFSSMBRead(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_io_parms *io_parms,
> rc = smb_EIO2(smb_eio_trace_read_overlarge,
> data_length, count);
> *nbytes = 0;
> + } else if ((size_t)data_offset + data_length > rsp_iov.iov_len) {
> + /* check that the data lies within the received response */
> + cifs_dbg(FYI, "bad data offset %u length %d for read response of %zu\n",
> + data_offset, data_length, rsp_iov.iov_len);
@data_length is now unsigned, so use '%u' instead. Also, print __func__
in cifs_dbg().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 15:02 [PATCH] smb: client: reject out-of-bounds DataOffset in CIFSSMBRead() Diego Oliva
2026-08-29 2:35 ` Namjae Jeon
2026-08-31 12:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Diego Oliva
2026-08-31 22:15 ` Paulo Alcantara [this message]
2026-09-01 14:05 ` Diego Oliva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0abfb2d2f99e54aceac4cea63947b65a@manguebit.org \
--to=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=bharathsm@microsoft.com \
--cc=diego@bynar.io \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sprasad@microsoft.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox