From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: simo Subject: Re: encryption on network Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 09:25:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1311945937.4297.163.camel@pico.li.ssimo.org> References: <06B0D589A4AC0243AD95D4DA4978081A182DE84D@mbx024-e1-nj-6.exch024.domain.local> <4E31E9DD.2060604@ubiqx.mn.org> <20110728235410.GA4976@jeremy-laptop> <4E31F9E4.2030004@ubiqx.mn.org> <20110729001133.GA6742@jeremy-laptop> <4E31FE48.7060606@ubiqx.mn.org> <06B0D589A4AC0243AD95D4DA4978081A182DEC78@mbx024-e1-nj-6.exch024.domain.local> <4E321C18.5000201@ubiqx.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Steve French , Dominic Dougherty , "samba-technical@lists.samba.org" , Jeremy Allison , "linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org" To: "Christopher R. Hertel" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E321C18.5000201@ubiqx.mn.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org List-Id: linux-cifs.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 21:34 -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > On 07/28/2011 09:11 PM, Dominic Dougherty wrote: > > 2.) the newer version of samba supports SSL. However, the only valid client for this is smbclient. Not support by the "net use" command. > > This, as Jeremy so rightly pointed out, is based on the Unix extensions to SMB. No, that's gssapi based encryption, we used to have support for SSL encryption in the past (using a very nasty hack) but I think we removed that support way back during the 3.0.x series. -- Simo Sorce Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc.