From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74984322536 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757608330; cv=none; b=XUhFyE4EmxdT3GRhuorfRGa2K793b86CAy5wDtgOJsVXMLJpNljiJw+X8PxukbGAZizOVBBFl/78Dk09+AfWYBwcvwm/QvTbW/t26i5vmhvPQ0KLg7bxiOwH+A6fDqaPcyXN81FMCB+i5rTJTseoZW2L2Dtuw+Suq9CXFWBEO5o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757608330; c=relaxed/simple; bh=srxHJhhiDdL6phJrQcSzmrUkW9hOG/BKDUogbzi+Hmw=; h=From:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date:Message-ID; b=gWMUJTDhYibRSOCbYO8J7H5h9Xi8NgUjeRzpdkr6y4kU1xQaugkGvD8OR6/u6Y0vX5wvOShYMV+XCOatyasTA22GpxTxccA01gRzX9NjfPA7ekffmFNdFhXmdlGq0Pv2Tf75/W6z0+G+s3zcmBV1IJaWfbu8m4Uu3t6rTxyTIgs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=XnvukVUo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="XnvukVUo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1757608327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=srxHJhhiDdL6phJrQcSzmrUkW9hOG/BKDUogbzi+Hmw=; b=XnvukVUo2rc/kmRqoq7kdQGeKinaFd6uy+qUu5OF7R0s7Vt+VvudBNhVOsBgLyhOi5XpxD emZ2x0c+PadweU8nP/Uby24W+iWzgVGqqVMoacvIuagFy8KO/ZziOII6tW2Td2NIgYQYMO 13JwbuENnRqt5q+SJ4VMBbl4TVWIbuA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-371-VZAKZYXcNOGnZ5IeFPJMnw-1; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 12:32:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VZAKZYXcNOGnZ5IeFPJMnw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: VZAKZYXcNOGnZ5IeFPJMnw_1757608322 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1EC61944F03; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (unknown [10.42.28.6]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99611800576; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 16:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <2025091109-happiness-cussed-d869@gregkh> References: <2025091109-happiness-cussed-d869@gregkh> <20250911030120.1076413-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> <2780505c-b531-7731-3c3d-910a22bf0802@huawei.com> To: Greg KH Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, yangerkun , sfrench@samba.org, pc@manguebit.com, lsahlber@redhat.com, sprasad@microsoft.com, tom@talpey.com, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, stable@kernel.org, nspmangalore@gmail.com, ematsumiya@suse.de, yangerkun@huaweicloud.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cifs: fix pagecache leak when do writepages Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1955890.1757608316.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 17:31:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1955891.1757608316@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 Greg KH wrote: > Yes, please include the info as to why this is not a backport from > upstream, and why it can only go into this one specific tree and get the > developers involved to agree with this. Backporting the massive amount of changes to netfslib, fscache, cifs, afs, 9p, ceph and nfs would kind of diminish the notion that this is a stable kernel;-). David