From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184E113958C; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711740529; cv=none; b=gjT4lFL9nbbUZ8kGA2kMU6WYVimGVTPhaQcnKppJqmlhrfH1Pc6XR3xNSqW28TXHaWzdBQ7BHHiuQ2jdfJlQZqHbGYJ03XnprIKhr2QwJ7aekwU2EG8+x3mu+MpWyR4NaZ65ScITgCiCaZkWonfz26mVgV0GA6fNkMs0tWvNzqw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711740529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EuthMF2I/CGCzxqbIW6CTFTU3WJ9GvZd0sLdLmgf2QM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Mime-Version; b=RksE7e0w28O8cUNyFEDkqLWY3XTf70U4dAK/8cje+wovQOhIsqjcXvHJrAiWXrRjWVFEdncldifozBn1aIv/h912oWbmAyNszvdMZfENef3SMLLPxw76Mbo161L5fvoreeN9gRAX1OHEu2nwK/o4N20cUEPf7k/EJPbYaX+UlAQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=QpzfPYRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="QpzfPYRT" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42TJOar2005192; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:05 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=RPm6LRHYSctRSd+zM9QadhHObB66yv7gwSwuVesuA4Q=; b=QpzfPYRTKVLh+Nmh2zSXApG3hcBPdLM/EAUwlCEcKdPZfpAKQh4rDmWySWa+O8IH9HOv IcW67No8lUENsqTIjGSF9Z1hvun1we3W0qrOAZWg/S8odqEuwmaKw4eQr2MAzjn+rj8e IpKoGhJ3m0CqrGlW8Wms6p5o0iaMOvUDc+orarW7exVzH3Hi19dsOeDyF6zehkKruCyK cBu9NopCa4gVQxEkBBXkL1H+hUp2oLL3CV2Q9UiA/yPnvl6uGNjeXm3TAivgUX+nD91X B4OPdtV79Vfo8UX3i45vIgq+fVetYGQV8ukp2me1ed/a6h2yDxBDCkVDctroSZgJ7usi 8g== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x61peg9dy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:05 +0000 Received: from m0353728.ppops.net (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 42TJS4B2011403; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:04 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x61peg9de-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:04 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 42TGmPMS028620; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:02 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.4]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3x2adpwyqr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:02 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.101]) by smtprelay02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 42TJS0gu42205732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:02 GMT Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0890258074; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:28:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAAA58070; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-5cd3c5cc-21f9-11b2-a85c-a4381f30c2f3.ibm.com (unknown [9.61.12.217]) by smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 19:27:58 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1fe6813db395563be658a9b557931cf4db949100.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: evm: Rename *_post_path_mknod() to *_path_post_mknod() From: Mimi Zohar To: Paul Moore Cc: Roberto Sassu , dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, pc@manguebit.com, christian@brauner.io, Roberto Sassu , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Greg KH Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:27:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20240329105609.1566309-1-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> <20240329105609.1566309-2-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-23.el8_9) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: ZNE1V6pIpT0OlP36vtct_NB6tvbA6TUj X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: HCT9qPZXNSd6ke-dTfHCrx6LyGPgzf-y X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-03-29_13,2024-03-28_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=940 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2403210000 definitions=main-2403290174 [Cc: Sasha, Greg] On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 15:12 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > I'd take it one step further and remove both 'Fixes' tags. A 'Fixes' > tag implies a flaw in the functionality of the code, this is just a > function rename. Totally agree. > Another important thing to keep in mind about 'Fixes' tags, unless > you've told the stable kernel folks to only take patches that you've > explicitly marked for stable, they are likely going to attempt to > backport anything with a 'Fixes' tag. How do we go about doing that? Do we just send an email to stable? Is it disabled for security? I thought new functionality won't be backported. Hopefully the changes for making IMA & EVM full fledged LSMs won't be automatically backported to stable. thanks, Mimi