Linux CIFS filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] CIFS: Expand CurrentMid field
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:24:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120319162410.42b95f13@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331910574-998-11-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>

On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:09:33 +0300
Pavel Shilovsky <piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> While in CIFS/SMB we have 16 bit mid, in SMB2 it is 64 bit.
> Convert the existing field to 64 bit and mask off higher bits
> for CIFS/SMB.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |    2 +-
>  fs/cifs/cifsproto.h |    2 +-
>  fs/cifs/misc.c      |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index a403398..b213458 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ struct TCP_Server_Info {
>  				   vcnumbers */
>  	int capabilities; /* allow selective disabling of caps by smb sess */
>  	int timeAdj;  /* Adjust for difference in server time zone in sec */
> -	__u16 CurrentMid;         /* multiplex id - rotating counter */
> +	__u64 CurrentMid;         /* multiplex id - rotating counter */

It occurs to me that a simpler way to do this might be to turn this
into a union with a u16 and u64 field. This works just as well though...

>  	char cryptkey[CIFS_CRYPTO_KEY_SIZE]; /* used by ntlm, ntlmv2 etc */
>  	/* 16th byte of RFC1001 workstation name is always null */
>  	char workstation_RFC1001_name[RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL];
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> index db38a40..8958721 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ extern int small_smb_init_no_tc(const int smb_cmd, const int wct,
>  				void **request_buf);
>  extern int CIFS_SessSetup(unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
>  			     const struct nls_table *nls_cp);
> -extern __u16 GetNextMid(struct TCP_Server_Info *server);
> +extern __u64 GetNextMid(struct TCP_Server_Info *server);
>  extern struct timespec cifs_NTtimeToUnix(__le64 utc_nanoseconds_since_1601);
>  extern u64 cifs_UnixTimeToNT(struct timespec);
>  extern struct timespec cnvrtDosUnixTm(__le16 le_date, __le16 le_time,
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/misc.c b/fs/cifs/misc.c
> index 88459d0..0b743b7 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/misc.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/misc.c
> @@ -213,54 +213,61 @@ cifs_small_buf_release(void *buf_to_free)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -	Find a free multiplex id (SMB mid). Otherwise there could be
> -	mid collisions which might cause problems, demultiplexing the
> -	wrong response to this request. Multiplex ids could collide if
> -	one of a series requests takes much longer than the others, or
> -	if a very large number of long lived requests (byte range
> -	locks or FindNotify requests) are pending.  No more than
> -	64K-1 requests can be outstanding at one time.  If no
> -	mids are available, return zero.  A future optimization
> -	could make the combination of mids and uid the key we use
> -	to demultiplex on (rather than mid alone).
> -	In addition to the above check, the cifs demultiplex
> -	code already used the command code as a secondary
> -	check of the frame and if signing is negotiated the
> -	response would be discarded if the mid were the same
> -	but the signature was wrong.  Since the mid is not put in the
> -	pending queue until later (when it is about to be dispatched)
> -	we do have to limit the number of outstanding requests
> -	to somewhat less than 64K-1 although it is hard to imagine
> -	so many threads being in the vfs at one time.
> -*/
> -__u16 GetNextMid(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
> + * Find a free multiplex id (SMB mid). Otherwise there could be
> + * mid collisions which might cause problems, demultiplexing the
> + * wrong response to this request. Multiplex ids could collide if
> + * one of a series requests takes much longer than the others, or
> + * if a very large number of long lived requests (byte range
> + * locks or FindNotify requests) are pending. No more than
> + * 64K-1 requests can be outstanding at one time. If no
> + * mids are available, return zero. A future optimization
> + * could make the combination of mids and uid the key we use
> + * to demultiplex on (rather than mid alone).
> + * In addition to the above check, the cifs demultiplex
> + * code already used the command code as a secondary
> + * check of the frame and if signing is negotiated the
> + * response would be discarded if the mid were the same
> + * but the signature was wrong. Since the mid is not put in the
> + * pending queue until later (when it is about to be dispatched)
> + * we do have to limit the number of outstanding requests
> + * to somewhat less than 64K-1 although it is hard to imagine
> + * so many threads being in the vfs at one time.
> + */
> +__u64 GetNextMid(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>  {
> -	__u16 mid = 0;
> -	__u16 last_mid;
> +	__u64 mid = 0;
> +	__u16 last_mid, cur_mid;
>  	bool collision;
>  
>  	spin_lock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
> -	last_mid = server->CurrentMid; /* we do not want to loop forever */
> -	server->CurrentMid++;
> -	/* This nested loop looks more expensive than it is.
> -	In practice the list of pending requests is short,
> -	fewer than 50, and the mids are likely to be unique
> -	on the first pass through the loop unless some request
> -	takes longer than the 64 thousand requests before it
> -	(and it would also have to have been a request that
> -	 did not time out) */
> -	while (server->CurrentMid != last_mid) {
> +
> +	/* mid is 16 bit only for CIFS/SMB */
> +	cur_mid = (__u16)((server->CurrentMid) & 0xffff);
> +	/* we do not want to loop forever */
> +	last_mid = cur_mid;
> +	cur_mid++;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This nested loop looks more expensive than it is.
> +	 * In practice the list of pending requests is short,
> +	 * fewer than 50, and the mids are likely to be unique
> +	 * on the first pass through the loop unless some request
> +	 * takes longer than the 64 thousand requests before it
> +	 * (and it would also have to have been a request that
> +	 * did not time out).
> +	 */
> +	while (cur_mid != last_mid) {
>  		struct mid_q_entry *mid_entry;
>  		unsigned int num_mids;
>  
>  		collision = false;
> -		if (server->CurrentMid == 0)
> -			server->CurrentMid++;
> +		if (cur_mid == 0)
> +			cur_mid++;
>  
>  		num_mids = 0;
>  		list_for_each_entry(mid_entry, &server->pending_mid_q, qhead) {
>  			++num_mids;
> -			if (mid_entry->mid == server->CurrentMid &&
> +			if (mid_entry->mid == cur_mid &&
>  			    mid_entry->midState == MID_REQUEST_SUBMITTED) {
>  				/* This mid is in use, try a different one */
>  				collision = true;
> @@ -282,10 +289,11 @@ __u16 GetNextMid(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
>  			server->tcpStatus = CifsNeedReconnect;
>  
>  		if (!collision) {
> -			mid = server->CurrentMid;
> +			mid = (__u64)cur_mid;
> +			server->CurrentMid = mid;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		server->CurrentMid++;
> +		cur_mid++;
>  	}
>  	spin_unlock(&GlobalMid_Lock);
>  	return mid;

Not directly related to this patch, but should we move all of these mid
operations under the req_lock instead of the GlobalMid_Lock? The global
spinlock is a bottleneck and all of the structures involved should be
per-server anyway.

Anyway, I think this looks ok

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-19 20:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-16 15:09 [PATCH v2 00/11] Prepare transport code for future SMB2 usage Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found] ` <1331910574-998-1-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 01/11] CIFS: Respect negotiated MaxMpxCount Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-2-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 11:12       ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <20120317071201.7f28683b-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 14:53           ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]             ` <CAKywueTDsGhcHiGM_uX6V0dnY3m_W4kD2qcb+JWRq=UVnBnvPw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 15:20               ` Steve French
     [not found]                 ` <CAH2r5msMKiEyS2-ak2+tQoRFommSHRcCNwp-J+XtgovmSae7-A-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-18 10:33                   ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-18 10:50                   ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]                     ` <20120318065059.62592afb-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-18 18:23                       ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]                         ` <CAKywueSrGVvwqHbTK3sNLsHDx3vR6U0Ca712ZXKNTnjnOgPGDA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 15:04                           ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]                             ` <20120319110437.635ea546-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:04                               ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]                                 ` <CAKywueR2mWNKxNDhhj_0i0TfiPz3nmvVBXbxGMZ+Lrbgts3cDQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:32                                   ` Steve French
     [not found]                                     ` <CAH2r5mvhTYPxvDRFCpQ0ULmDn2TNQ80ODbnvTmgFurptYukR1Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:39                                       ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 02/11] CIFS: Simplify inFlight logic Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-3-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 11:07       ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 03/11] CIFS: Introduce credit-based flow control Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-4-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 10:32       ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <20120317063258.77618c0e-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 14:56           ` Pavel Shilovsky
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 04/11] CIFS: Make wait_for_free_request killable Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-5-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-17 11:13       ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 05/11] CIFS: Prepare credits code for a slot reservation Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-6-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:27       ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <20120319152702.3eee1608-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20  7:03           ` Pavel Shilovsky
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 06/11] CIFS: Delete echo_retries module parm Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-7-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-18 10:30       ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 07/11] CIFS: Separate protocol-specific code from transport routines Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-8-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:31       ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 08/11] CIFS: Separate protocol-specific code from demultiplex code Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-9-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 19:41       ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <20120319154150.03713caf-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20  7:29           ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]             ` <CAKywueTxicF658ys1yBzC_95qw0v8R+6pxuhZ_zc+aRKyRLFdw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20 10:22               ` Jeff Layton
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 09/11] CIFS: Separate protocol-specific code from cifs_readv_receive code Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-10-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 20:17       ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <20120319161728.1f8cec40-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20  7:33           ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]             ` <CAKywueSvsb+BP7ktb0QEgL3WmrO8j42bicvd-WjWNro6qGRc7w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20 10:24               ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]                 ` <20120320062414.554a033c-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20 10:54                   ` Pavel Shilovsky
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 10/11] CIFS: Expand CurrentMid field Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-11-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 20:24       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
     [not found]         ` <20120319162410.42b95f13-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 20:48           ` Steve French
     [not found]             ` <CAH2r5mujZook3O2Ojvu+vjx5Y5uYuormbtbDW69iOLEf1XVQgg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20  7:37               ` Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]                 ` <CAKywueTpa6Hmz7oQ=8S1ViRU9ky7wqhKN+f=eaWrJY1457X86w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20 10:28                   ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]                     ` <20120320062843.1cd218ed-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-20 22:21                       ` Steve French
2012-03-16 15:09   ` [PATCH v2 11/11] CIFS: Change mid_q_entry structure fields Pavel Shilovsky
     [not found]     ` <1331910574-998-12-git-send-email-piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-03-19 20:28       ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120319162410.42b95f13@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=piastry-7qunaywFIewox3rIn2DAYQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox