From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Disseldorp Subject: Re: Samba server bug: CopyChunk from one share to a different share on same server Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 13:46:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20151109134613.4ae8148c@plati> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: samba-technical , "linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Mohammad Samian Yusuf To: Steve French Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:52:16 -0600, Steve French wrote: > Tried a quick experiment using cloner (David's tool - xfstests/src/cloner) > to copy a file from share1 to share2 on the same target server (using > CopyChunk and SMB3). Works fine for Windows (tried Windows 8.1) but failed > for Samba 4.2. > > This is one of the more important cases to support (copying a file from one > share to another) > > Samba returns STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND on FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK_WRITE > unless source and target are on the same share. I didn't try it with > vfs_btrfs (the test system was running ext4, and both exports are on the > same volume on the server). It's no different across Samba VFS modules - this behaviour is intended. The persistent/volatile handle is used to generate the copy-chunk resume key. file_fsp_get() is currently used to lookup the source fsp using the destination file connection context. > Was testing the change below where I relax the copy offload check as > follows (to allow cross share copy chunk as Windows does) > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/ioctl.c b/fs/cifs/ioctl.c > index 28a77bf..35cf990 100644 > --- a/fs/cifs/ioctl.c > +++ b/fs/cifs/ioctl.c > @@ -85,9 +85,14 @@ static long cifs_ioctl_clone(unsigned int xid, struct > file *dst_file, > src_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_src->tlink); > target_tcon = tlink_tcon(smb_file_target->tlink); > > - /* check if source and target are on same tree connection */ > - if (src_tcon != target_tcon) { > - cifs_dbg(VFS, "file copy src and target on different volume\n"); > + /* check source and target on same server (or volume if dup_extents) */ > + if (dup_extents && (src_tcon != target_tcon)) { > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "source and target of copy not on same share\n"); > + goto out_fput; > + } > + > + if (!dup_extents && (src_tcon->ses != target_tcon->ses)) { > + cifs_dbg(VFS, "source and target of copy not on same server\n"); > goto out_fput; > } > > This change looks fine to me. Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp Cheers, David