From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C15C43381 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4722070D for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728314AbfCZQyr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:54:47 -0400 Received: from isilmar-4.linta.de ([136.243.71.142]:52430 "EHLO isilmar-4.linta.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727492AbfCZQyr (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:54:47 -0400 Received: from light.dominikbrodowski.net (isilmar.linta [10.0.0.1]) by isilmar-4.linta.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7022008B3; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by light.dominikbrodowski.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73A6320AF5; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:53:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:53:58 +0100 From: Dominik Brodowski To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] CIFS: prevent refcount underflow Message-ID: <20190326165358.GA5080@light.dominikbrodowski.net> References: <20190326071819.GA10639@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <20190326123921.4116-1-aaptel@suse.com> <20190326154654.GA2073@light.dominikbrodowski.net> <87h8bpy3us.fsf@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87h8bpy3us.fsf@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-cifs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:53:15PM +0100, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > > Dominik Brodowski writes: > > Reported-and-tested-by: Dominik Brodowski > > Great, thanks Dominik. > > I chose to keep a refcount_t instead of a simple int because it still checks > for overflows. Yes, that sounds to be the better option. Thanks, Dominik