From: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
To: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: <kernel@axis.com>, <tom@talpey.com>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
<linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] cifs: Silently ignore unknown oplock break handle
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 14:57:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210319135711.11802-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> (raw)
Make SMB2 not print out an error when an oplock break is received for an
unknown handle, similar to SMB1. The debug message which is printed for
these unknown handles may also be misleading, so fix that too.
The SMB2 lease break path is not affected by this patch.
Without this, a program which writes to a file from one thread, and
opens, reads, and writes the same file from another thread triggers the
below errors several times a minute when run against a Samba server
configured with "smb2 leases = no".
CIFS: VFS: \\192.168.0.1 No task to wake, unknown frame received! NumMids 2
00000000: 424d53fe 00000040 00000000 00000012 .SMB@...........
00000010: 00000001 00000000 ffffffff ffffffff ................
00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
00000030: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
---
Notes:
v3:
- Change debug print to Tom Talpey's suggestion
v2:
- Drop change to lease break
- Rewrite commit message
fs/cifs/smb2misc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c b/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c
index 60d4bd1eae2b..76cd05b8d53b 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2misc.c
@@ -754,8 +754,8 @@ smb2_is_valid_oplock_break(char *buffer, struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
}
}
spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
- cifs_dbg(FYI, "Can not process oplock break for non-existent connection\n");
- return false;
+ cifs_dbg(FYI, "No file id matched, oplock break ignored\n");
+ return true;
}
void
--
2.28.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-19 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-19 13:57 Vincent Whitchurch [this message]
2021-03-19 14:03 ` [PATCH v3] cifs: Silently ignore unknown oplock break handle Tom Talpey
2021-03-25 15:21 ` Steve French
2021-03-25 15:32 ` Paulo Alcantara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210319135711.11802-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--to=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
--cc=kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox