public inbox for linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-cifsd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] cifsd: fix WARNING: convert list_for_each to entry variant in smb2pdu.c
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:19:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618081900.GR1901@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4adc3507-6b34-1f23-36cb-21336d5e8e91@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 03:47:12PM +0800, libaokun (A) wrote:
> 在 2021/6/18 13:14, Dan Carpenter 写道:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:44:37AM +0800, libaokun (A) wrote:
> > > I don't know what the difference is between
> > > 
> > > list_for_each_entry() and list_for_each() for 'struct channel *chann',
> > > 
> > > but I don't think there's any difference here.
> > Correct.  There is no difference, but Coccinelle is smart enough to
> > parse list_for_each_entry() and it's not smart enough to parse
> > list_for_each().
> > 
> > > Would you give me more detial about this, please?
> > There is a Coccinelle script scripts/coccinelle/iterators/itnull.cocci
> > which will complain about the NULL check in the new code so this patch
> > will introduce a new warning.  We may as well remove the unnecessary
> > NULL check and avoid the warning.
> > 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> > 
> > .
> 
> I get your point, but this bug has nothing to do with my patch.
> 
> It's  from e2f34481b24d(cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3).
> 

Fine, but when Hulk Robot reports the new warning and someone fixes it,
I'm going to insist that the Fixes tag points to your patch.  ;)

regards,
dan carpenter


      reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-17  6:46 [PATCH -next] cifsd: fix WARNING: convert list_for_each to entry variant in smb2pdu.c Baokun Li
2021-06-17  9:26 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-18  1:44   ` libaokun (A)
2021-06-18  5:14     ` Dan Carpenter
2021-06-18  7:47       ` libaokun (A)
2021-06-18  8:19         ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210618081900.GR1901@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hulkci@huawei.com \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifsd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox