Re: setcifsacl: Shouldn't 0x0 be a valid mask?

Bruno Wolff III
2021-09-23T19:50:12Z

I'm still trying to get the correct syntax for icacls, but when I
used a GUI I was able to add an ACL with no access which icacls
will display:
PS C:\Users\bruno-a> icacls forwards
forwards OWNER RIGHTS:
NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(I)(F)
BUILTIN\Administrators:(I)(F)
AD\bruno-a:(I)(F)

Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files