From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8631C4332F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8686F6105A for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235177AbhIWQtY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:49:24 -0400 Received: from wolff.to ([98.103.208.27]:33554 "HELO wolff.to" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S236459AbhIWQtX (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:49:23 -0400 Received: (qmail 2878 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2021 16:35:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 11:35:46 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III To: Steve French Cc: CIFS Subject: Re: setcifsacl: Shouldn't 0x0 be a valid mask? Message-ID: <20210923163546.GB2631@wolff.to> References: <20210923155510.GA2171@wolff.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:15:26 -0500, Steve French wrote: >Do you have an example of doing the same thing via > >"smbcacls" (from Linux) or "icacls" (or cacls.exe) from Windows? smbcacls seems to also not allow 0x0 for the permissions part of the ACL. I'll see if I can check on cacls.exe.