From: "Atte Heikkilä" <atteh.mailbox@gmail.com>
To: tom@talpey.com
Cc: atteh.mailbox@gmail.com, linkinjeon@kernel.org,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ksmbd: validate share name from share config response
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 00:21:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221002212137.156711-1-atteh.mailbox@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baba86a7-060b-c878-95ed-0310def52850@talpey.com>
On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 14:34:43 -0400, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 10/2/2022 11:40 AM, Atte Heikkilä wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Oct 2022 05:46:28 +0300, Atte Heikkilä wrote:
>>> ...
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_netlink.h b/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_netlink.h
>>> index e0cbcfa98c7e..ff07c67f4565 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_netlink.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/ksmbd_netlink.h
>>> @@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ struct ksmbd_share_config_response {
>>> __u16 force_directory_mode;
>>> __u16 force_uid;
>>> __u16 force_gid;
>>> - __u32 reserved[128]; /* Reserved room */
>>> + __s8 share_name[KSMBD_REQ_MAX_SHARE_NAME];
>>> + __u32 reserved[112]; /* Reserved room */
>
> I notice you still have "112" here, did you reject my suggestion
> to code the size relative to KSMBD_REQ_MAX_SHARE_NAME?
>
If size of `reserved' should be relative, then it would be:
128 - DIV_ROUND_UP(KSMBD_REQ_MAX_SHARE_NAME, sizeof(__u32))
Since ksmbd-tools already has the 112 (128-64/4), I thought to keep the
kernel side consistent with it for now.
> Either way I think I made a flawed suggestion. The "reserved" field
> is __u32 but the KSMBD_REQ_MAX_SHARE_NAME is __s8. So, two things:
>
> - why is share_name an __s8? Wouldn't __u8 be more appropriate?
As I understand it, the only reason for `__s8' over `__u8' here is that
`char' is most often a signed type.
> - why is reserved a __u32? ISTM that __u8 would also be a better
> choice, and then the size would be "512 - KSMBD_REQ_MAX_SHARE_NAME".
>
>
I don't know why `reserved' is `__u32'. I agree that it would be better
if it was `__u8'.
>>> __u32 veto_list_sz;
>>> __s8 ____payload[];
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.c b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.c
>>> index 5d039704c23c..dfb4bb365891 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.c
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>> #include "user_config.h"
>>> #include "user_session.h"
>>> #include "../transport_ipc.h"
>>> +#include "../misc.h"
>>>
>>> #define SHARE_HASH_BITS 3
>>> static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(shares_table, SHARE_HASH_BITS);
>>> @@ -119,7 +120,8 @@ static int parse_veto_list(struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static struct ksmbd_share_config *share_config_request(const char *name)
>>> +static struct ksmbd_share_config *share_config_request(struct unicode_map *um,
>>> + const char *name)
>>> {
>>> struct ksmbd_share_config_response *resp;
>>> struct ksmbd_share_config *share = NULL;
>>> @@ -133,6 +135,17 @@ static struct ksmbd_share_config *share_config_request(const char *name)
>>> if (resp->flags == KSMBD_SHARE_FLAG_INVALID)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> + if (*resp->share_name) {
>>> + char *cf_resp_name;
>>> + bool equal;
>>> +
>>> + cf_resp_name = ksmbd_casefold_sharename(um, resp->share_name);
>>> + equal = !IS_ERR(cf_resp_name) && !strcmp(cf_resp_name, name);
>>> + kfree(cf_resp_name);
>>
>> Well, kfree() is *not* a no-op for ERR_PTR() like it is for NULL so
>> this patch is not good either. At least I'm running out of ways to get
>> this wrong.
>
> :)
>
> Tom.
>
>
>>
>>> + if (!equal)
>>> + goto out;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> share = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ksmbd_share_config), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!share)
>>> goto out;
>>> @@ -190,7 +203,8 @@ static struct ksmbd_share_config *share_config_request(const char *name)
>>> return share;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -struct ksmbd_share_config *ksmbd_share_config_get(const char *name)
>>> +struct ksmbd_share_config *ksmbd_share_config_get(struct unicode_map *um,
>>> + const char *name)
>>> {
>>> struct ksmbd_share_config *share;
>>>
>>> @@ -202,7 +216,7 @@ struct ksmbd_share_config *ksmbd_share_config_get(const char *name)
>>>
>>> if (share)
>>> return share;
>>> - return share_config_request(name);
>>> + return share_config_request(um, name);
>>> }
>>>
>>> bool ksmbd_share_veto_filename(struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.h b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.h
>>> index 7f7e89ecfe61..3fd338293942 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/share_config.h
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>>> #include <linux/hashtable.h>
>>> #include <linux/path.h>
>>> +#include <linux/unicode.h>
>>>
>>> struct ksmbd_share_config {
>>> char *name;
>>> @@ -74,7 +75,8 @@ static inline void ksmbd_share_config_put(struct ksmbd_share_config *share)
>>> __ksmbd_share_config_put(share);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -struct ksmbd_share_config *ksmbd_share_config_get(const char *name);
>>> +struct ksmbd_share_config *ksmbd_share_config_get(struct unicode_map *um,
>>> + const char *name);
>>> bool ksmbd_share_veto_filename(struct ksmbd_share_config *share,
>>> const char *filename);
>>> #endif /* __SHARE_CONFIG_MANAGEMENT_H__ */
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/tree_connect.c b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/tree_connect.c
>>> index 867c0286b901..8ce17b3fb8da 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/tree_connect.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/mgmt/tree_connect.c
>>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ ksmbd_tree_conn_connect(struct ksmbd_conn *conn, struct ksmbd_session *sess,
>>> struct sockaddr *peer_addr;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> - sc = ksmbd_share_config_get(share_name);
>>> + sc = ksmbd_share_config_get(conn->um, share_name);
>>> if (!sc)
>>> return status;
>>>
>>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ ksmbd_tree_conn_connect(struct ksmbd_conn *conn, struct ksmbd_session *sess,
>>> struct ksmbd_share_config *new_sc;
>>>
>>> ksmbd_share_config_del(sc);
>>> - new_sc = ksmbd_share_config_get(share_name);
>>> + new_sc = ksmbd_share_config_get(conn->um, share_name);
>>> if (!new_sc) {
>>> pr_err("Failed to update stale share config\n");
>>> status.ret = -ESTALE;
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/misc.c b/fs/ksmbd/misc.c
>>> index 28459b1efaa8..9e8afaa686e3 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/misc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/misc.c
>>> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void ksmbd_conv_path_to_windows(char *path)
>>> strreplace(path, '/', '\\');
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static char *casefold_sharename(struct unicode_map *um, const char *name)
>>> +char *ksmbd_casefold_sharename(struct unicode_map *um, const char *name)
>>> {
>>> char *cf_name;
>>> int cf_len;
>>> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ char *ksmbd_extract_sharename(struct unicode_map *um, const char *treename)
>>> name = (pos + 1);
>>>
>>> /* caller has to free the memory */
>>> - return casefold_sharename(um, name);
>>> + return ksmbd_casefold_sharename(um, name);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/misc.h b/fs/ksmbd/misc.h
>>> index cc72f4e6baf2..1facfcd21200 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/misc.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/misc.h
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ int get_nlink(struct kstat *st);
>>> void ksmbd_conv_path_to_unix(char *path);
>>> void ksmbd_strip_last_slash(char *path);
>>> void ksmbd_conv_path_to_windows(char *path);
>>> +char *ksmbd_casefold_sharename(struct unicode_map *um, const char *name);
>>> char *ksmbd_extract_sharename(struct unicode_map *um, const char *treename);
>>> char *convert_to_unix_name(struct ksmbd_share_config *share, const char *name);
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.37.3
>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-02 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-02 2:46 [PATCH v4] ksmbd: validate share name from share config response Atte Heikkilä
2022-10-02 15:40 ` Atte Heikkilä
2022-10-02 18:34 ` Tom Talpey
2022-10-02 21:21 ` Atte Heikkilä [this message]
2022-10-03 2:06 ` Namjae Jeon
2022-10-03 14:14 ` Tom Talpey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221002212137.156711-1-atteh.mailbox@gmail.com \
--to=atteh.mailbox@gmail.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox