From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7003C47090 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 06:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233936AbiLFGhD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 01:37:03 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230036AbiLFGhD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 01:37:03 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440B3220D1 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 22:37:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 003C66732D; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:36:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 07:36:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Steve French Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, David Howells Subject: Re: RFC: remove cifs_writepage Message-ID: <20221206063657.GA6939@lst.de> References: <20221116131835.2192188-1-hch@lst.de> <20221204081913.GB26937@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:22:12PM -0600, Steve French wrote: > Ran some tests today with the three patch (remove writepage for > cifs.ko) series. Let me know if any updates for those. Also let me > know which gti branch you would like to see these merged from (mine or > yours e.g.) If they work and look fine to you please queue them up in the cifs tree as-is. > I did see an intermittent failure (when run with these three patches) > that doesn't appear to be obviously related to yours but am still > investigating it. Test 043 failed once, and on one of retries of the > group - test 045 failed once. See example below. This looks related > to an issue with deferred close (handle leases) and reference counts > holding up unmount, and not related to these patches (at least at > first glance). Continuing to debug Yes. I have no good idea but to may suggest what NFS does about silly renamed inodes to ensure they don't try to get in the way of mount.