[PATCH 2/2] cifs: handle cases where multiple sessions share connection

[nspmangalore@gmail.com]

From: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>

Based on our implementation of multichannel, it is entirely
possible that a server struct may not be found in any channel
of an SMB session.

In such cases, we should be prepared to move on and search for
the server struct in the next session.

Signed-off-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
---
 fs/smb/client/connect.c | 6 ++++++
 fs/smb/client/sess.c    | 1 -
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/smb/client/connect.c b/fs/smb/client/connect.c
index 28cacdd90bbf..c984d802d2f7 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/connect.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/connect.c
@@ -233,6 +233,12 @@ cifs_mark_tcp_ses_conns_for_reconnect(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(ses, nses, &pserver->smb_ses_list, smb_ses_list) {
 		/* check if iface is still active */
 		spin_lock(&ses->chan_lock);
+		if (cifs_ses_get_chan_index(ses, server) ==
+		    CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX) {
+			spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (!cifs_chan_is_iface_active(ses, server)) {
 			spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
 			cifs_chan_update_iface(ses, server);
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/sess.c b/fs/smb/client/sess.c
index 476d54fceb50..8f37373fd333 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/sess.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/sess.c
@@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ cifs_ses_get_chan_index(struct cifs_ses *ses,
 	if (server)
 		cifs_dbg(VFS, "unable to get chan index for server: 0x%llx",
 			 server->conn_id);
-	WARN_ON(1);
 	return CIFS_INVAL_CHAN_INDEX;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1